What exactly are you claiming here? Are you saying because Merck typed out an introductory statement in a webpage that this confirms the virus theory of disease? Or are you claiming that because Merck says viruses are parasites of a particular size that “viruses” exist in some form, regardless of their nature?
Oh for fucks sake you fucking retard, OP is simply putting out new and interesting information. If you have questions around it, do your own fucking research.
I didn’t ask the question of you, Bill. I asked it in terms of defining the subject. We can’t assume, as the reader what the author means by ‘nature’ considering the subject is back up for debate. Here I am enjoying this thought provoking post and I contribute with more questions and Bill here gets offended. Fucking retarded.
What exactly are you claiming here? Are you saying because Merck typed out an introductory statement in a webpage that this confirms the virus theory of disease? Or are you claiming that because Merck says viruses are parasites of a particular size that “viruses” exist in some form, regardless of their nature?
I'm not making a claim. I am sharing information that i find interesting. If you disagree elaborate, I'll probably find that interesting too.
I do find this interesting and don't believe the full understanding has yet been achieved
Yes you are: “ I found something for the people that think virus' don't exist. Seems they exist, they're just not what we have been told.”
So will you answer the question?
You're not entitled to my replies 🤣
I found something to discuss. There's discussion. Get over yourself.
Getting this upset over asking for clarification sounds pretty niggerish.
What is their ‘nature’ then?
I can’t have a conversation with someone answering a question with a question.
Oh for fucks sake you fucking retard, OP is simply putting out new and interesting information. If you have questions around it, do your own fucking research.
You okay, bud? You’re getting a little upset.
It breaks your programming?
No, it’s just rude.
I didn’t ask the question of you, Bill. I asked it in terms of defining the subject. We can’t assume, as the reader what the author means by ‘nature’ considering the subject is back up for debate. Here I am enjoying this thought provoking post and I contribute with more questions and Bill here gets offended. Fucking retarded.
This you?
“What is their ‘nature’ then?”
Fucking retarded indeed.