It has been claimed they will be used to strike Russia by Ukraine. Unlike former assurances of they won't be. Hasn't it hit the press last week by Kiev.
It's an escalation into, it puts Ukraine into a target of tactical strikes. Does Russia attack outside of it. It becomes a question of how far the game of Russian roulette goes. If tactical strikes on Ukraine are made as retaliation for long range missiles hitting inside of Russia, does it cause full-blown nuclear war?
Bankers don't win in that scenario. Banks require a population indebted. Because all a bank does is lend you, credit, it profits off. Every transaction gives the banks revenue. It goes and prints more crap. They call this crap money or something.
In a scenario where the population has significantly lessened, because the population is under unrest to the extremes of disaster, banks are useless. No money in them. They've emptied out the accounts of crap, and fucked off to their next grab. There are only resources in that situation. Food, water, goods, fuel, and the actual raw materials. Money becomes an illusion. Of course human stupidity still relies on it. So somebody else can claim they have more. But it effectively is redundant.
The probability is they will be used inside of Russia. Ukraine have got nothing else. If they had something else, they wouldn't need long range missiles assuming they can't be hit. Because placing the missiles further away works. Not. What good are longer range missiles? Explain. An act of the desperate, who simply beg escalation. Because it raises the stakes. Those stakes are strikes inside Russia. When they're hit. What does it cause?
In a scenario of nuclear war. It's real simple and real obvious. There ain't an east if there's no west. There's no South if there's no North. The Globe has gone MAD. Those nukes are surfacing from everywhere and hitting everywhere. What isn't hit has fallout in the forms of planetary darkness. Nuclear winter blocking out our sun, radiation in the jetstreams, gulf streams, weather.
Of course it might just be limited to tactical strikes on the dumb piggy squealing for it. It begs for war. All it has done. Go on hit it. It's a dumb punchbag. Like that cartoon of the insane straitjacket, helmet banging their head into a wall. It doesn't hurt when it stops.
Why give them long range missiles? They aren't for anything else except testing Russian missile defense inside of Russia. It causes what? What is the conclusion here?
Banks, no. Individuals surely. Because banks are sooner useless in a scenario of nuclear war.
I'm mildly horrified that the posters here aren't seeing that the endgame is a post-banking and currency world, where "the bankers" control the population digitally with earned resources.
Mr. Supreme, I agree that massive depopulation is a precursor to that, because they can't control 8 billion and don't need that many actual humans to run things – with nukes as a possibility.
I thought the aliens were going to come and save us?
"It's their decision where to use them"
We just supply them, arm them and aim them...
So are you mad at the gun manufacturers for all the school shootings too?
Lol wut
False equivalence.
It's perfect.
It has been claimed they will be used to strike Russia by Ukraine. Unlike former assurances of they won't be. Hasn't it hit the press last week by Kiev.
It's an escalation into, it puts Ukraine into a target of tactical strikes. Does Russia attack outside of it. It becomes a question of how far the game of Russian roulette goes. If tactical strikes on Ukraine are made as retaliation for long range missiles hitting inside of Russia, does it cause full-blown nuclear war?
War resets currency
Bankers don't win in that scenario. Banks require a population indebted. Because all a bank does is lend you, credit, it profits off. Every transaction gives the banks revenue. It goes and prints more crap. They call this crap money or something.
In a scenario where the population has significantly lessened, because the population is under unrest to the extremes of disaster, banks are useless. No money in them. They've emptied out the accounts of crap, and fucked off to their next grab. There are only resources in that situation. Food, water, goods, fuel, and the actual raw materials. Money becomes an illusion. Of course human stupidity still relies on it. So somebody else can claim they have more. But it effectively is redundant.
The probability is they will be used inside of Russia. Ukraine have got nothing else. If they had something else, they wouldn't need long range missiles assuming they can't be hit. Because placing the missiles further away works. Not. What good are longer range missiles? Explain. An act of the desperate, who simply beg escalation. Because it raises the stakes. Those stakes are strikes inside Russia. When they're hit. What does it cause?
In a scenario of nuclear war. It's real simple and real obvious. There ain't an east if there's no west. There's no South if there's no North. The Globe has gone MAD. Those nukes are surfacing from everywhere and hitting everywhere. What isn't hit has fallout in the forms of planetary darkness. Nuclear winter blocking out our sun, radiation in the jetstreams, gulf streams, weather.
Of course it might just be limited to tactical strikes on the dumb piggy squealing for it. It begs for war. All it has done. Go on hit it. It's a dumb punchbag. Like that cartoon of the insane straitjacket, helmet banging their head into a wall. It doesn't hurt when it stops.
Why give them long range missiles? They aren't for anything else except testing Russian missile defense inside of Russia. It causes what? What is the conclusion here?
Banks, no. Individuals surely. Because banks are sooner useless in a scenario of nuclear war.
I'm mildly horrified that the posters here aren't seeing that the endgame is a post-banking and currency world, where "the bankers" control the population digitally with earned resources.
Mr. Supreme, I agree that massive depopulation is a precursor to that, because they can't control 8 billion and don't need that many actual humans to run things – with nukes as a possibility.
Bigot!