There Is No Freedom of Speech Without Freedom of Reach
“New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.” -Elon Musk 11-18-22 “This isn’t that hard. Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of reach.” - Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL 4-5-22 Every now and then someone new comes around and ...
Aka: You can know the truth , but you can't tell it to anyone else or discuss it.
Another wordgame by language manipulators.
The WEF and their shills (zuckerfag, ADL, Musk, Yaccarino) are pushing the globalist slogan:
I was surprised to hear Elon Musk's WEF shill bring out the quote.
Musk repeats this slogan.
The first time I heard this bullshit slogan was the undercover James O'Keefe video of ADL shills at a diner. ( I will try to find the video and edit and link later.)
Then I find ZuckerFag reciting this slogan about "freedom of speech not freedom of reach" https://techcrunch.com/2019/11/22/watch-sacha-baron-cohen-skewer-zuckerbergs-twisted-logic-on-hate-speech-and-fakes/
So basically this "freedom of speech not freedom of reach" is WEF slogan campaign to try to globally distort and twist what FREE SPEECH actually is.
They want to gatekeep and confine your free speech so much that no one hears it. They but up all the social media and newspapers and tv channels with fake printed jew money, then leave you with your "speech" that no one gets to hear.
Also this Yaccarino bitch is suspect as hell.
There's no online information about her upbringing, where she family comes from, her ethnicity or religion. I smell a jew. Her nose curving down like a ski ramp doesn't help her case.
She seems to have pattern of being installed on jewish controlled platforms such as NBC Universal, boosted by Forbes, career started at commie Turner Broadcast.
I read some suspecting her of being part Italian or possible catholic upbringing. Which reminds me of my constant beefs with catholics on these forums. There's a large number of people (Trump supporters, conspiracy theorists, ConPro White Nationalists) who still defend or affiliate with that organization no matter how fucked it is.
She's married to some creepy looking Italian from Turner Broadcast named Claude Peter Madrazo who looks like a jew raped his mother too.
This is why I made a Truth account. Never had a Twatter. These are people on Truth that despise Trump, and tried that reporting game there. It didn't work. Truth updated.
Btw : this policy is why Desantimonius had a failure for election launch. They designed his opinion not to be reachable, and then invited him on. That's why the head engineer quit the next day. It did what it was designed to do.
a) REACH (Latin rego) - "to make straight"...being implies odds (life) within straight (inception towards death) while struggling to sustain self.
b) being alive implies sentenced from inception towards death...others suggest progressivism (points) to distract one from resisting origin.
c) fluid sound (entire) generates (general) solid instruments (partial)...others suggest affixed definitions (words) to distract one from that.
d) speech (suggested information) tempts one to ignore general sound (perceivable inspiration)...it's on oneself to resist want to hold onto suggested for need to let go of perceivable.
a) form (life) is addressed by flow (inception towards death), hence each partial instrument (perception) being audience within whole sound (perceivable).
AUD'IENCE, noun - "hearing, or attending to sounds"...not consenting to the suggested words by others, which implies failing to attend perceivable sound.
b) perceivable sound implies actual; suggested words represent re-actual, hence being shaped within and in response to enacting sound.
c) what is speech? Ones consent to suggested spell-craft aka a LETTER (one who permits) aka an idol worshiper (upholding suggested within perceivable) aka one who consents to a death sentence, when permitting others to appoint definitions.
MONO (one) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...reasoning about suggested information (words) represents ones internal monologue aka ones ignorance of perceivable inspiration (sound).
I am one of the few (30%?) who has an ongoing inner dialogue. I only recently found this out when a study was shared online about how over half of people have no monologue going on inside their own conscious. I do not usually say monologue because there's not just one, but multiple voices in my head arguing every choice and decision. Perhaps one voice is my ego and another voice is the proverbial angel on my shoulder and there's probably another voice more representative of a devil telling me to do whatever i can get away with and there's another voice that is a constant skeptic or distrustful defense mechanism.
I am capable of having internal dialogue without ignoring external perceivable sound/inspiration.
In other words I can walk and chew gum at the same time, so to speak.
a) inner (life) implies temporary; outer (inception towards death) implies ongoing, hence outer (loss) sustaining inner (growth).
b) dialogue aka DI (division) LOG (logic; reason + logos; word)...inner reasoning over suggested words tempts one to ignore outer flow of perceivable sound.
a) your consent to that shared study established a foundation of suggested information within your mind/memory, which tempts you to ignore "found out" aka outside foundation of perceivable inspiration.
b) ones consent to suggested studies establish others as master (teacher) and self as slave (student), hence STUDY (to fix the mind closely upon a subject).
Mind/memory needs to adapt to fluid (inspiration), which requires one to resist the want to affix (information).
Mono refers to one-self; multiple voices in "ones" head implies as counted by one-self. Consider if it's same sound uttered in different voices, instead of "multiple" voices?
Each different voice responds to the same sound, yet most are falling for the temptation of what others are shaping with voice...words; definitions; idols; brands; letters; numbers; names; symbolism etc.
Aka reasoning over suggested information aka conflict.
a) EV'ERY (each individual of a whole collection or aggregate number)...it's ones individual choice which chooses to collect or aggregate suggested numbers. Try each (single) instead of every (plural)...
b) DECI'DE (to determine; to form a definite opinion; to come to a conclusion)...being alive implies in-between initiation (inception) and conclusion (death). Form (solid) implies within flow (fluid), hence not definite (affixed).
a) suggested mechanism tempts one to ignore natural employment for artificial work (Latin machina).
b) defense (life) within offense (inception towards death) implies resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
c) Nature offers (offense); resisting fertilizes ones resistance (defense)...others tempt one to get offended by consenting to their proposed offering (suggested information).
a) CAPABLE (able to hold or contain)...perception cannot hold onto or contain perceivable inspiration, yet others can tempt one to hold onto and contain suggested information within ones mind/memory.
b) consider if you internally recreate perceivable inspiration (sound) with suggested information (words); hence reasoning over contradicting definitions for a system that already moved on, hence further contradicting whatever you hold onto?
c) internal implies different from external...do you use the same language for both? Try to use a secondary language internally and your primary language externally to regain control over your ego. Languages represent operating systems with a backdoor (suggested information) to others.
The trick...OPERATE (to produce by agency). Being implies regent (life) produced within agency (inception towards death), hence representing a regent SYSTEM (Latin systema; Gr. to set; assemblage of partials within whole).
In short...oneself represents system within operation; others suggest one to consent to hold onto operating systems (languages).