The powdered aluminum from contrails makes trees more flammable, but this seems to indicate that trees were NOT as subject to the flames. I'm skeptical of this, and not coming to any conclusions on it. It's a good video though, the first half at least, that I watched.
See this documentary. It's long, but the part about how powdered aluminum from the chemtrails is an accelerant starts at 40:40, but it's mentioned periodically throughout, at some point when the documentary focuses on Hawaii.
Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance. Lifetime of a satellite what is it? A decade to 15 years? Orbital platform. Now it needs constant resupplying.
Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.
Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?
As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.
Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.
He suggested microwave weapon as opposed to laser. Atmosphere where lasers struggle. They struggle in weather. Clouds dust. Enough to cause the beam to reflect. Microwave is even worse the further away. It becomes less believable. Guesswork outside of an anomaly. But we've seen the same thing in California. Not quite to the same extent of those cars.
No you're believing in fiction because an anomaly occurred.
Look at what you linked. Dumb ass. Crowd control. Microwave. That distance is what? Crowd control. Like what range? It isn't on a satellite orbital platform.
Really. I'm ignorant. I am the only person offering debate. You're a space monkey. Look what you linked. It has a title a description and range. On a truck.
There you are telling me you swear it's a space monkey.
Believe in the space monkey.
I link pictures, of wildfire, not on Maui where the same thing occurred. You're telling me I am ignorant. No you're blind and stupid and ignorant.
I can link pictures of Russia, Australia, Amazon, etc etc.
The same, trees are more resistance than today's crap. These guys Glenfield Tower. There are plants that are almost entirely fire proof. But a modern building is full of accelerants burning to Ash.
Worse it could've been accelerated. But it weren't no space monkeys.
The entire time. This is what grinds me is you're hostile to any other suggestions. It was a space monkey or else. It's Flat Earth or else. They're cannibals eating pineal glands or else. Or else you start telling me look. Look what you tell me.
How do you get through your day? Blind leading the dumb causing the insane. No different to all those things you're against. Your programming is simpler and even more stupid. It hates. Easy.
I already told you, which you seem to have overlooked because your reading comprehension sucks, likely because English isn't you native language, that I won't debate whether the fires were natural or by other means, because I personally think they were natural. I was pointing out that you were mangling some else's argument.
So....if you're going to debate someone....perhaps pay attention to what they write.
No you didn't. We had to debate it. Now it's your denial.
You linked a crowd control microwave weapon. Denying the lasers. Lasers as discussed leave an impact. Especially on metal. You went and linked a microwave with much less range.
Now it's my English? I am not called, a Russian peasant.
I don't have to debate anything, due to your failure to grasp middle school level English, yet here I am. You should be thanking me.
Again, you wanna talk about lasers. Nobody is talking about lasers. I linked to a microwave weapon because the people saying a DEW was used in Hawaii are not saying it's lasers, but microwaves...which is what the link was too. Got it?
And again, I don't think it was a DEW, so you're debating figments of your own imagination.
No. I offered several points of discussion in separate posts of conversation.
Because I doubt the veracity of this topic. He hasn't done his homework. Especially when it gets into the space monkeys, as an explanation for it.
He said in all his fire experience. Yet we look at it. It's happening globally. Everywhere.
The only time tree's get burnt to stumps is largely, if they're napalmed. Or if the fire carries on burning.
Otherwise fire is its own beast. It seems our modern buildings fair no better. In fact they're the first things burnt, like all that other kindling. We look at the cars, Canada, California, possibly Australia, and Russia it's the same.
I haven't checked Greece and Spain. But I am gonna make a guess the cars melted.
The reason for it. Is the increasing use of alloy metals in modern cars. It isn't the solid chassis. Rather all the alloy metal. It melts with all the accelerants, upholstery, rubber, plastics, fuel, until the glass shatters and melts. The same in our houses today. Full of combustibles.
Hell I am no fire detective, but I don't believe in Space Monkeys. Not yet. That tech isn't there. Not on that scale. Not from Space.
Where the fuck are the children.. it doesn't take weeks for such a small area
They're probably turned to ashes. Those weapons heat the house up so fast that a person wouldn't have time to run out.
The powdered aluminum from contrails makes trees more flammable, but this seems to indicate that trees were NOT as subject to the flames. I'm skeptical of this, and not coming to any conclusions on it. It's a good video though, the first half at least, that I watched.
links? interesting. would like to know more about this.
See this documentary. It's long, but the part about how powdered aluminum from the chemtrails is an accelerant starts at 40:40, but it's mentioned periodically throughout, at some point when the documentary focuses on Hawaii.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0iDcgHWrvWrJ/
Not from Planes. Angles. Planes fly over and are observable. What orbital platform? It would be visible. It would be huge. The multiple hits needed, the power source. You're talking charge times. Multiple lasers. It needs cooling. The laser gets damaged the more it fires. The laser blooms, and there's refraction, the beam to impact gets weaker over distances. It is carrying energy not light. Plus it's in upper orbit. There are angles, speed of the fly over, keeping it in orbit. Or it's full of fuel thrusters mechanics keeping it in position to fire multiple times. Where is the constant resupply and maintenance. Lifetime of a satellite what is it? A decade to 15 years? Orbital platform. Now it needs constant resupplying.
Where is the hole. Particularly from a laser. It heats an object piercing it. Leaving on metal a burned hole, where it heats the object. Every laser does this. Rocks trees metal. The impact mark. A fire inspector knows this. Where the fire accelerated from the source of the heat. It ignited from there it was hottest. Lasers leave a heat spot, where it get hotter and hotter, causing a hole or burn. Look at lasers downing missiles, and shells. They have a hole through them. Drones tend to burst into flames leaving a sorch mark. Where the laser slices through making an impact hole.
Why isn't Russia using the same tech in Ukraine?
As a fire inspector are there any compounds, chemicals that can acceralerate the fire on houses and vehicles. White ash is common in complete fire degradation. No carbon left just ash extreme heat. It's completely burnt.
Instead what we have is guesswork, and it's those aliens again.
He suggested microwave weapon as opposed to laser. Atmosphere where lasers struggle. They struggle in weather. Clouds dust. Enough to cause the beam to reflect. Microwave is even worse the further away. It becomes less believable. Guesswork outside of an anomaly. But we've seen the same thing in California. Not quite to the same extent of those cars.
It's not lasers, it's microwaves. The arborist says that clearly. I can tell you're just naysaying to naysay, which is fine I suppose.
Think of it as a bigger version of this: https://terasense.com/news/active-denial-system-a-terahertz-based-military-deterrent-for-safe-crowd-control/
Pictures.
https://news.sky.com/story/california-wildfires-the-eerie-aftermath-of-devastating-fire-tornadoes-11453851
https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_nbcnews-fp-1200-630,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2017_43/2199136/172023-california-wildfires-aftermath-santa-rosa-se-149p.jpg
https://www.canadiancontractor.ca/canadian-contractor/updated-fort-mcmurray-construction-association-still-frustrated-ministry-silence/1003277085/attachment/13221470_877079962438338_3395570939608416852_n/
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/g25055513/california-wildfires-photos/
How about we get a pro in. Instead of I dunno what this topic link is. Look the same. Look.
You were talking about lasers, nobody is talking about lasers.
I'm saying, if you're going to debate someone, at least get their argument correct!
I'm not going to debate whether it was a natural fire or not, because I personally think it was.
No you're believing in fiction because an anomaly occurred.
Look at what you linked. Dumb ass. Crowd control. Microwave. That distance is what? Crowd control. Like what range? It isn't on a satellite orbital platform.
You're so ignorant, it pains me to think how you make your way through life. It's the same principles of physics, that's the point.
Really. I'm ignorant. I am the only person offering debate. You're a space monkey. Look what you linked. It has a title a description and range. On a truck.
There you are telling me you swear it's a space monkey.
Believe in the space monkey.
I link pictures, of wildfire, not on Maui where the same thing occurred. You're telling me I am ignorant. No you're blind and stupid and ignorant.
I can link pictures of Russia, Australia, Amazon, etc etc.
The same, trees are more resistance than today's crap. These guys Glenfield Tower. There are plants that are almost entirely fire proof. But a modern building is full of accelerants burning to Ash.
Worse it could've been accelerated. But it weren't no space monkeys.
The entire time. This is what grinds me is you're hostile to any other suggestions. It was a space monkey or else. It's Flat Earth or else. They're cannibals eating pineal glands or else. Or else you start telling me look. Look what you tell me.
How do you get through your day? Blind leading the dumb causing the insane. No different to all those things you're against. Your programming is simpler and even more stupid. It hates. Easy.
I already told you, which you seem to have overlooked because your reading comprehension sucks, likely because English isn't you native language, that I won't debate whether the fires were natural or by other means, because I personally think they were natural. I was pointing out that you were mangling some else's argument.
So....if you're going to debate someone....perhaps pay attention to what they write.
No you didn't. We had to debate it. Now it's your denial.
You linked a crowd control microwave weapon. Denying the lasers. Lasers as discussed leave an impact. Especially on metal. You went and linked a microwave with much less range.
Now it's my English? I am not called, a Russian peasant.
I don't have to debate anything, due to your failure to grasp middle school level English, yet here I am. You should be thanking me.
Again, you wanna talk about lasers. Nobody is talking about lasers. I linked to a microwave weapon because the people saying a DEW was used in Hawaii are not saying it's lasers, but microwaves...which is what the link was too. Got it?
And again, I don't think it was a DEW, so you're debating figments of your own imagination.
You double replied. That's an L. Hold it nerd. Or should I say nerds?
No. I offered several points of discussion in separate posts of conversation.
Because I doubt the veracity of this topic. He hasn't done his homework. Especially when it gets into the space monkeys, as an explanation for it.
He said in all his fire experience. Yet we look at it. It's happening globally. Everywhere.
The only time tree's get burnt to stumps is largely, if they're napalmed. Or if the fire carries on burning.
Otherwise fire is its own beast. It seems our modern buildings fair no better. In fact they're the first things burnt, like all that other kindling. We look at the cars, Canada, California, possibly Australia, and Russia it's the same.
I haven't checked Greece and Spain. But I am gonna make a guess the cars melted.
The reason for it. Is the increasing use of alloy metals in modern cars. It isn't the solid chassis. Rather all the alloy metal. It melts with all the accelerants, upholstery, rubber, plastics, fuel, until the glass shatters and melts. The same in our houses today. Full of combustibles.
Hell I am no fire detective, but I don't believe in Space Monkeys. Not yet. That tech isn't there. Not on that scale. Not from Space.