I already told you, which you seem to have overlooked because your reading comprehension sucks, likely because English isn't you native language, that I won't debate whether the fires were natural or by other means, because I personally think they were natural. I was pointing out that you were mangling some else's argument.
So....if you're going to debate someone....perhaps pay attention to what they write.
No you didn't. We had to debate it. Now it's your denial.
You linked a crowd control microwave weapon. Denying the lasers. Lasers as discussed leave an impact. Especially on metal. You went and linked a microwave with much less range.
Now it's my English? I am not called, a Russian peasant.
I don't have to debate anything, due to your failure to grasp middle school level English, yet here I am. You should be thanking me.
Again, you wanna talk about lasers. Nobody is talking about lasers. I linked to a microwave weapon because the people saying a DEW was used in Hawaii are not saying it's lasers, but microwaves...which is what the link was too. Got it?
And again, I don't think it was a DEW, so you're debating figments of your own imagination.
the account you're engaging with isn't a legit user, someone genuinely interested in spreading knowledge, info, and engaging in honest discourse. check it's comment history. this "user" is here to spread FUD in the forum and turn off casual browsers and those who may've just discovered the site. accounts such as Ep0ch are also used to waste time of legit users who might otherwise have meaningful, more productive discussions.
Understanding Russian peasants isn't my strong suit. No sir. I speak English.
The laser as discussed leaves bigger evidence. Think about it. Don't, I explained it. But now it's full on microwaves, and photon cannons. Because of the Space Monkeys.
That range you linked is worse, than a laser. It was on a truck. Not a satellite. The lasers on satellites aren't weapons. Unless the satellite is deployed for use against reentry targets and other satellites.
Who knows what happened? But I am disbelieving the space monkeys.
I already told you, which you seem to have overlooked because your reading comprehension sucks, likely because English isn't you native language, that I won't debate whether the fires were natural or by other means, because I personally think they were natural. I was pointing out that you were mangling some else's argument.
So....if you're going to debate someone....perhaps pay attention to what they write.
No you didn't. We had to debate it. Now it's your denial.
You linked a crowd control microwave weapon. Denying the lasers. Lasers as discussed leave an impact. Especially on metal. You went and linked a microwave with much less range.
Now it's my English? I am not called, a Russian peasant.
I don't have to debate anything, due to your failure to grasp middle school level English, yet here I am. You should be thanking me.
Again, you wanna talk about lasers. Nobody is talking about lasers. I linked to a microwave weapon because the people saying a DEW was used in Hawaii are not saying it's lasers, but microwaves...which is what the link was too. Got it?
And again, I don't think it was a DEW, so you're debating figments of your own imagination.
the account you're engaging with isn't a legit user, someone genuinely interested in spreading knowledge, info, and engaging in honest discourse. check it's comment history. this "user" is here to spread FUD in the forum and turn off casual browsers and those who may've just discovered the site. accounts such as Ep0ch are also used to waste time of legit users who might otherwise have meaningful, more productive discussions.
How is it my failure if you're not debating it?
Understanding Russian peasants isn't my strong suit. No sir. I speak English.
The laser as discussed leaves bigger evidence. Think about it. Don't, I explained it. But now it's full on microwaves, and photon cannons. Because of the Space Monkeys.
That range you linked is worse, than a laser. It was on a truck. Not a satellite. The lasers on satellites aren't weapons. Unless the satellite is deployed for use against reentry targets and other satellites.
Who knows what happened? But I am disbelieving the space monkeys.
Okay, we're done here with you wasting my time. Buh bye.