Update on the Maui fires (D.E.W & missing children)
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
But why use a laser? You could use anything. You could've aimed the observatory telescope. I mean seriously. It was that hot. It was that dry. It was a drought. The telescope caused a reflection. And whoosh.
The sophisticated laser causes the dry weather. All thoses resources. Then the monkeys do it to themselves. Why would it need to get involved. My billion, no, more now, so much more, causes a fire any monkey rubbing two sticks starts.
I watched that dumb documentary a few hours ago switched it right off. New documentary total bullshit it stunk. But released this year about these monkeys who buried their dead. Total nonsense, what age was monkey, what age was the cave. Why weren't monkey found when the cave was a mine. Why are the useless graduates telling me how monkey went into cave to bury dead when nobody established what that actual geology was. Hell any number of events could've caused different geology or forced the monkey into cave. Why was the monkey swinging through the eroded cave, going down 12 meter drops and through narrow passages with dead, when the fat man couldn't get through them. If it was adapted to walking and swinging in trees, why is it burying dead in a cave? Switched it off, when they started acting like monkeys. They started swinging about and kissing the skull. Never got far enough to see the tools the monkey used. It supposedly had fire, by rubbing the sticks together. They're calling the find the biggest in history. The monkey supposedly buried its dead. Fooey. It stunk. Don't recommend it.
But fire is millions of years old. Lasers a few decades. DEWs late 90s. 97? Boeing's jumbo jet? It needed an entire Jumbo Jet to fire the DEW. It became real redundant, missile was quicker. But it shot down the tests obviously.
You don't need a jet to fire a small chemical laser, there are diy youtube videos on how to make small hand held chemical lasers that can kill insects or ignite paper from quite a distance. You can simply mount it on a Walmart drone, it doesn't have to be very high to not be noticed especially in a low population area. As to why? Idk some random dude was using a syringe to put poison gas in a family house because a baby was crying and that is pretty unorthodox. Why would anyone throw a molotov or do any arson? No one can really knows but the arsonist and there may not even be a reason. Maybe he seen a youtuber make one and thought he could get away with setting field on fire but it got out of hand. Or he just hated the place. The fact everyone thinks something that is impossible more of an excuse for someone to eventually try and get away with it. I'm not even saying i think this is what it was, just that this is a very real possibility and shouldn't be discredited because someone is gaslighting the more simple solution into something crazy like space lasers or military jets. Dew is a simple term like ufo. A Walmart drone can be considered a ufo if it is unidentified but that doesn't mean aliens. You can make a home made dew with a microwave or maybe something like a tesla coil that shoots electricity up to a certain range and even a homemade laser pointer.
When I said Jumbo Jet to fire the laser was when Boeing made an entire Jet to fire the laser. It was all of 25 years ago. Since lasers power sources have advanced. They're fit as defensive weapons on smaller aircraft and vehicles. But they're primarily defensive weapons. Unless it's electronic warfare. Disabling key electronic systems.
They want to make them offensive. Literally the ammo. All those shells currently Ukraine. Billions.
But lasers aren't there. They still need huge power sources. Recharge times. Suffer loss. The powered weaponised beam blooms over distances, getting weaker and weaker. It needs a bigger power source. Where it is subjected to the environment. Clouds, weather, dust. They can defect that beam. The laser overheats and needs cooling. If it keeps firing it burns itself out. Some of this has just been addressed by the Chinese last month. They claim to be able to fire constantly. But it's still limited by range unless we are talking the biggest lasers on the planet. They need entire structures and powerstations.
As example CERN. I should look this up. How many nuclear stations. How many times do they fire it. How many adjustments before it fires from one test to the next. 3 nuclear reactors in CERN's radius? It fires on average like what once every 3 to 5 years? After all that adjustment between. What are those stats?
We aren't talking CERN. We are talking about a weapon. But it needs to destroy stuff.
So in Maui on that car or house. It fires the beam, it keeps it there superheating the object until it ignites the object. Or the laser passes through it. Not quite on solid masses. Metal concrete whatever. It leaves a visible trace. A burn hole. Not a bullet hole. A burn hole. Where the laser, hot, super hot, caused the supposed combustion.
Where is that beam weapon's power source? Where did it fire from? Where is the evidence like the burn hole?
Not how you tortured insects with a magnifying glass.
You have a clear misunderstanding of how these things actually work. The technology has advanced a lot since last you actually checked. You can make pocket size lasers that start fires disguised as a flashlight. You don't even need a drone. It all could have been for fun because people are like that now. It seems you are protesting too much. You sound like a shill, because 90% of people on this site are feds or trolls. So i assume you are arguing out of bad faith which is only reinforcing the dew theory.
No you do fuckhead.
You dumb stupid pubescent retard. You dumb fucking retarded fictional American. We has Starwars we has secret laser better than China. So secret we kill ourselves. Are you sacred China. We blew up Maui for you. You live on cloud fucking cuckoo. It serves an agenda. Don't worry. It's attempting to flip the vote.
Where is the burn hole. Like a bullet hole, the burn hole. Where is the source of the discharge. Ground zero.
Not whether power lines ignite.
A particle beam is a type of laser. No it's not infrared. It's a weaponised beam.
So when it contacts. You dumb fucking retard. It leaves a burn hole. It has superheated the object hit. When something hot hits you, you get burnt, right. Where?
Again you fucking retarded little turd. The test was on missiles launching into upper orbit ICBMs they're how high up?
Again you fucking retarded little cunt. It needs a fleet of satellites firing multiple beams. If indeed they can fire a beam vaporising cars and houses superheating them.
Where are the powersources for that many hits. Not one hit. It was firing like how many times you spazs are claiming look laser.
Those cars that metal the burnhole where it superheated it. Like when it hit the missiles it leaves a distinct mark. The missile explodes but there's the forensics, where this beam hit that metal.
Anything could've caused that fire easier.
Don't tell me I don't know stuff. Take your flashlight shove it up your ass. Don't you dare complain about my language you started it. You called me a shill. All because you don't know how beams work.