Update on the Maui fires (D.E.W & missing children)
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Dumb stupid doesn't understand lasers. Offers bullshit.
How the fuck is a satellite firing a laser weapon? A powerful enough beam weapon to cause that. Think about it. A powerful enough laser. Its energy source. As that beam weapon hits our atmosphere it loses the power in its beam. It blooms. Branches off. Becoming weaker and weaker.
We aren't taking about laser sights. Or quazer. Or lasers communicating. A weapon you fucking schizo retard. Go look it up. At what point was it on a satellite?
How did the fire engines respond. They used a line. Where? In that other schizo topic.
As far as the asphalt, it's the surface layer of certain roads. It has been burnt in many videos. Melted. The layer underneath compacted scree, rock, concrete, sand is evident. Not every road uses asphalt either. Because it melts in temperature. Like temperatures in Maui.
Every single time. It's like buzzwords to cattle. They're freaking programmed. The only explanation. See how easy they fed it. Only this time it's the space lasers. You're no different to a clot shot.
These half brained retards. The spy balloon happened when. Those lasers from a Lidar/GPS mapping satellite happened when? It was originally thought to be a Nasa weather satellite. It also uses lasers for mapping the atmosphere
6 months before Maui. It wasn't from a DEW. Every time with American schizos. Every fucking time. Go look up lasers and what they do. Can they modify weather. Not those ones. They're laser mapping, painting lil targets for when they fire the DEW 6months later. What?
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/08/25/video-of-green-lights-in-the-sky-predates-maui-wildfires-fact-check/70671222007/
Yea I am using a factchecker rather than listening to pubescent E.Ts spewing member member the lasers they must have caused the fire. No. It's bullshit.
Yeah that does seem very silly. It wouldn't have to be a fancy space laser or even a spooky with their discontinued anti icbm dew. Just a homemade chemical laser capable of igniting small fires from a decent distance duct taped to a Walmart drone would be enough to ignite some dry grass. Seen a youtuber make one for a project that didn't involve arson. Saying it was something that ridiculous only discredits the idea that DEWs are possible when it's just a simple general term for a weapon that directs energy at someone much like ufo doesn't have to mean alien space ship.
But why use a laser? You could use anything. You could've aimed the observatory telescope. I mean seriously. It was that hot. It was that dry. It was a drought. The telescope caused a reflection. And whoosh.
The sophisticated laser causes the dry weather. All thoses resources. Then the monkeys do it to themselves. Why would it need to get involved. My billion, no, more now, so much more, causes a fire any monkey rubbing two sticks starts.
I watched that dumb documentary a few hours ago switched it right off. New documentary total bullshit it stunk. But released this year about these monkeys who buried their dead. Total nonsense, what age was monkey, what age was the cave. Why weren't monkey found when the cave was a mine. Why are the useless graduates telling me how monkey went into cave to bury dead when nobody established what that actual geology was. Hell any number of events could've caused different geology or forced the monkey into cave. Why was the monkey swinging through the eroded cave, going down 12 meter drops and through narrow passages with dead, when the fat man couldn't get through them. If it was adapted to walking and swinging in trees, why is it burying dead in a cave? Switched it off, when they started acting like monkeys. They started swinging about and kissing the skull. Never got far enough to see the tools the monkey used. It supposedly had fire, by rubbing the sticks together. They're calling the find the biggest in history. The monkey supposedly buried its dead. Fooey. It stunk. Don't recommend it.
But fire is millions of years old. Lasers a few decades. DEWs late 90s. 97? Boeing's jumbo jet? It needed an entire Jumbo Jet to fire the DEW. It became real redundant, missile was quicker. But it shot down the tests obviously.
You don't need a jet to fire a small chemical laser, there are diy youtube videos on how to make small hand held chemical lasers that can kill insects or ignite paper from quite a distance. You can simply mount it on a Walmart drone, it doesn't have to be very high to not be noticed especially in a low population area. As to why? Idk some random dude was using a syringe to put poison gas in a family house because a baby was crying and that is pretty unorthodox. Why would anyone throw a molotov or do any arson? No one can really knows but the arsonist and there may not even be a reason. Maybe he seen a youtuber make one and thought he could get away with setting field on fire but it got out of hand. Or he just hated the place. The fact everyone thinks something that is impossible more of an excuse for someone to eventually try and get away with it. I'm not even saying i think this is what it was, just that this is a very real possibility and shouldn't be discredited because someone is gaslighting the more simple solution into something crazy like space lasers or military jets. Dew is a simple term like ufo. A Walmart drone can be considered a ufo if it is unidentified but that doesn't mean aliens. You can make a home made dew with a microwave or maybe something like a tesla coil that shoots electricity up to a certain range and even a homemade laser pointer.
When I said Jumbo Jet to fire the laser was when Boeing made an entire Jet to fire the laser. It was all of 25 years ago. Since lasers power sources have advanced. They're fit as defensive weapons on smaller aircraft and vehicles. But they're primarily defensive weapons. Unless it's electronic warfare. Disabling key electronic systems.
They want to make them offensive. Literally the ammo. All those shells currently Ukraine. Billions.
But lasers aren't there. They still need huge power sources. Recharge times. Suffer loss. The powered weaponised beam blooms over distances, getting weaker and weaker. It needs a bigger power source. Where it is subjected to the environment. Clouds, weather, dust. They can defect that beam. The laser overheats and needs cooling. If it keeps firing it burns itself out. Some of this has just been addressed by the Chinese last month. They claim to be able to fire constantly. But it's still limited by range unless we are talking the biggest lasers on the planet. They need entire structures and powerstations.
As example CERN. I should look this up. How many nuclear stations. How many times do they fire it. How many adjustments before it fires from one test to the next. 3 nuclear reactors in CERN's radius? It fires on average like what once every 3 to 5 years? After all that adjustment between. What are those stats?
We aren't talking CERN. We are talking about a weapon. But it needs to destroy stuff.
So in Maui on that car or house. It fires the beam, it keeps it there superheating the object until it ignites the object. Or the laser passes through it. Not quite on solid masses. Metal concrete whatever. It leaves a visible trace. A burn hole. Not a bullet hole. A burn hole. Where the laser, hot, super hot, caused the supposed combustion.
Where is that beam weapon's power source? Where did it fire from? Where is the evidence like the burn hole?
Not how you tortured insects with a magnifying glass.
Tend to agree- DEWs are north line of sight and relatively short ranged at least in terms of the thermal effect. It's possible that masers could stay coherent for miles but from space? That would be like 30-40 miles minimum and would require substantial power especially for sustained operations such as is being proposed
Absolutely. So why would they use a laser? It seems redundant. You can start a fire a zillion ways. But guys we need the DEW, that way they won't suspect the fire? You have to be autistic. Or trying to sell lasers
Kinetic Bombardment is more plausible than a DEW hitting the Planet from space.
Yes there are space lasers. Are they influencing the weather sooner becomes debatable. You don't need trillion watt lasers either. Seeding still plays a role. But they're reading the weather. Providing Lidar. GPS. Laser targeting for missiles etc.
And there are DEWs in space, for disabling enemy satellites. Perhaps stopping re-entry vehicles. Although that tech isn't as sophisticated or as powerful as anything on the ground.
Possibly aerial platforms too. Anyways there was some legit shady stuff associated with this event so I'm still not convinced with the official narrative but then i see the space laser stuff as a purposeful misdirection for truthers
Yes heaps. More so in so many of these weather events. Mainly in the inadequate response. I am pissed at it. Years of the bungling narratives. The climate. Yet there simply isn't a big enough response to them when they occur. It has been getting better in America especially. It has a lot of manpower and resources. But it's specifically that response and then an aftermath that needs to better prepare.
If the response was inadequate it suggests it wasn't lasers. Rather stupidity. Perhaps purposeful. Let it run. Why if they let it run would they need lasers to accelerate it? They let it run. A they were unprepared. B so it scammed.
I am not going over burn forensics especially if I'm not a fire investigator. But I know that fire is its own beast. This burns that doesn't. A lot to do with any wind direction, and how they tackled it. It's always at a line, often from the sides they arrived at from the nearest point to it. These save public/state buildings, wealth, landmarks foremost. Sometimes bigger buildings have their own equipment and fire systems. Hoses.
Orbital platform, kinetic bombardment is still easier, gravity. Not quite a case of simply dropping tungsten rods, rather precisely. The window to hit becomes very hard to achieve the further away. So yea the Syfi lasers, and they need much bigger powersources. As any orbital platform is easily observed and further targeted easier than its payloads.
Unless it's a satellite, these can carry lasers, they do penetrate the ground by lidar. But they're not a weapon. Unless they start manipulating the weather with them. A potential. There is also talk about beaming energy to remote locations. It isn't by DEWs. Perhaps it can be weaponised. The idea isn't.
Where is that beam weapon, power source, enough to cause significant damage from space. Because as the laser weapon enters our atmosphere the beam, blooms, becoming weaker and weaker from its source. Beam weapon, blooms. Weaker from its power source. It needs a bigger power source to extended its power.
Lasers have advanced from a boeing jet shooting down ICBMs. But they're still defensive. They still need larger power sources and charge.