They technically can't. Unless it deports them and put them into camps.
How constitutional is that?
I imagine at the minute it's chaos. How long do investigations take. Weeks. How long before there's access and under what contracts can they rebuild? If they can? It is problematic to certain extents. Who has government lined up to redevelop it, what cost is it resold. Can they use their own contractors? Then there all the distribution to an Island and its services and grids.
Not all those people can regardless. How many weren't home owners?
It's different on the Mainland. But any comparison could be what happened in big hurricanes. New Orleans. Puerto Rico. Yea a long time.
Yep, royalty, and etc. Wasn't it a king at one point, I think. Like when Cook was killed?
They were too weak to stop progress. They would've been assimilated regardless.
Overthrown. Late 1800s. None resisted, the few who did, got sick, and the rest took the money, selling out their own. They'd been played off, since discovery. It was once the USA went coast to coast, no stopping it. They became a bigger problem.
Other Islands Caribbean were European colonies. Etc. Not as problematic. Hawaii is the nearest Islands not colonised to the USA coastline going West. Hence they became USA territory. Integrated since. But the monarchy succession of sovereignty was a tale of conquest.
The queen who had it taken from her married someone in politics. She knew how to fight by the rules they didn't agree to. I tried to explain to my kids how this was a big deal by comparing it to the Native Americans, who's error was expecting the government to value what they valued like honesty. She was giving them hell.
They made them sick, and bought them off. Killed others. Playing them off. Easy coup.
I wonder what happened to the rest of the lineage. There is far more to it.
The problem was she had no allies, in her attempts too, became more isolated. She could only be forced into submission due to the geography, trading lanes, location. She isolated herself being away, getting educated, travelling the globe. It probably fermented the rebellion. Despite some other songs, sung, too late. The money and industry coming in bought off support against her by her own people, which she tried to maintain her sovereignty of. But somehow the distrust was there. Coup. Despite any later orphanages. Sadly, where was her line?
I think that is a very liberal version of events. There is a much bigger pattern and there's amnesia.
Today people reminisce trying to find that collective history, but you won't understand that version.
They technically can't. Unless it deports them and put them into camps.
How constitutional is that?
I imagine at the minute it's chaos. How long do investigations take. Weeks. How long before there's access and under what contracts can they rebuild? If they can? It is problematic to certain extents. Who has government lined up to redevelop it, what cost is it resold. Can they use their own contractors? Then there all the distribution to an Island and its services and grids.
Not all those people can regardless. How many weren't home owners?
It's different on the Mainland. But any comparison could be what happened in big hurricanes. New Orleans. Puerto Rico. Yea a long time.
I never forget that Hawaii used to have a queen.
Yep, royalty, and etc. Wasn't it a king at one point, I think. Like when Cook was killed?
They were too weak to stop progress. They would've been assimilated regardless.
Overthrown. Late 1800s. None resisted, the few who did, got sick, and the rest took the money, selling out their own. They'd been played off, since discovery. It was once the USA went coast to coast, no stopping it. They became a bigger problem.
Other Islands Caribbean were European colonies. Etc. Not as problematic. Hawaii is the nearest Islands not colonised to the USA coastline going West. Hence they became USA territory. Integrated since. But the monarchy succession of sovereignty was a tale of conquest.
The queen who had it taken from her married someone in politics. She knew how to fight by the rules they didn't agree to. I tried to explain to my kids how this was a big deal by comparing it to the Native Americans, who's error was expecting the government to value what they valued like honesty. She was giving them hell.
https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/queen-lili-uokalani.htm#:~:text=Queen%20Lili'uokalani%20was%20the,Hawai'i%20during%20the%201890s.
They made them sick, and bought them off. Killed others. Playing them off. Easy coup.
I wonder what happened to the rest of the lineage. There is far more to it.
The problem was she had no allies, in her attempts too, became more isolated. She could only be forced into submission due to the geography, trading lanes, location. She isolated herself being away, getting educated, travelling the globe. It probably fermented the rebellion. Despite some other songs, sung, too late. The money and industry coming in bought off support against her by her own people, which she tried to maintain her sovereignty of. But somehow the distrust was there. Coup. Despite any later orphanages. Sadly, where was her line?
I think that is a very liberal version of events. There is a much bigger pattern and there's amnesia.
Today people reminisce trying to find that collective history, but you won't understand that version.