Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
Video Claimed to Show DEW in Lahaina (HI) (seed132.bitchute.com)
posted 2 years ago by brahbruh 2 years ago by brahbruh +6 / -0
21 comments share
21 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (21)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– cyberrigger 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

You wouldn't need DEW --- all you would need is an arsonist.

With the right wind, I've seen beach houses burn down like dominoes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– brahbruh [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

The biggest thing I think that lends some credibility to DEW (at least enough to explore it) is The speed. You'd have to have a pretty well coordinated plan with a lot of people involved in order to make sure that you had such a successful fire, especially among residential houses, which have measures in place to prevent fires from burning so efficiently.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lippy68 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

And how did all the ships catch on fire at the same time?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– brahbruh [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Especially all the ones there were hundreds of yards apart and away from shore.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– doubledowndude 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

They want the power companies to become liable so they can use courts to curtail the amount of power going out. This is all in the name of carbon reduction, false flag into action. The best game to gamble on is one you've made the rules for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Lippy68 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Even MSM said something like 95% of this year's Canada wildfires were set by humans.

So this could be true. I am open to either possibility and will wait for more info and videos.

Perhaps the locals will get angry and investigate or whistle-blow. Alternatively maybe they will all be paid off or die suddenly.

The theory with the Canadian wildfires in Quebec (that all happened at once) was either DEW or highly trained special-ops that keep quiet. I don't think they left those to the dubious competence of antifa. However, there is a crossover between undercover agents who are antifa

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– ReturnOfShillSlayer -2 points 2 years ago +1 / -3

Lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

qrd? what does DEW stand for?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– brahbruh [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Directed Energy Weapon (e.g., laser / light / other directed RF, etc.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Lippy68 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Basically an energy beam from above sent energy to fry the area. The govt has been hiding the tech for a while but I think they have been doing soft disclosure lately.

You have to check out some 9/11 stuff. It looks like DEWs were amongst the technology used.

https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/11334129 - I tried to find Dr Judy Wood's book on Amazon.com but it has been removed. If you want a copy try her website or other countries' Amazon's. The only existing forensic study of the destruction of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/YQOXq7umTr5o/

Dr Judy Wood has the most information and analysis about DEWs on 9/11. She goes through the physical evidence in this 2012 presentation without any conspiracy theories.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FDCY9kfkOM5v/

https://www.sott.net/article/253140-Dr-Judy-Wood-Where-Did-the-Towers-Go

#911Truth Part 14: Building 7 Turning to Dust for Over 7 Hours (Fast Forward 45X Speed). World Trade Center 7 (also referred to as WTC 7, Salomon Brothers building, or “Building 7”) has been far too often used erroneously (intentionally and unintentionally) as “proof” of conventional controlled demolition; https://youtu.be/YCtfQJAepfU

Radio show to discuss the evidence of seven World Trade Center buildings turning mostly into dust on September 11, 2001 https://youtu.be/PfcNvm-e4gk

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xolotltlaloc 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

...or lightening;

...or electric arches from downed-power lines.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– brahbruh [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Found this on ConPro; anyone think this shows something real, or do it think it's just a reflection off the window / windshield?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– DZP1 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Those two area-wide flashes at 4 seconds is definitely energy release in the atmosphere. It is neither lightning nor something like reflection in the sky of result of a transformer burning out, it is suspicious as hell. The rapid pulse speed of the flashes (couple milliseconds) says to me it's not a passing reflection in the car window, that would be a lot slower (quarter second maybe).

I note that "The Maui Space Surveillance System, is routinely involved in numerous observing programs and has the capability of projecting lasers into the atmosphere." Hmmm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maui_Space_Surveillance_Complex

I also note that the US Space Force has three groups dedicated to electromagnetic warfare. Translation - they may do DEW. The Maui operations are suspicious because they are heavily equipped to do optical technology and use lasers. It is plausible that the Maui facility could direct infrared lasers to ground locations below them, and IR lasers could instantly start fires with no effort. The video flashes are not of IR light, which is invisible, but an IR burst triggering fires would have rapid visible pulse flashes from the ignition.

Because the region was filled with extremely dry brush, it would be very easy to laser-ignite it quickly. CO2 IR lasers are routinely used to weld with, for example, and can get something very hot instantly. Also a mountain laser could reach the boats which mysteriously all burned too. One has to ask, how could burning brush make many boats on the ocean burn?

I found that the mountaintop Space Force facility at 10,000 feet in East Maui is 30 miles from the city of Lahaina in West Maui. The visibility distance to horizon from 10,000 feet is 123 miles thus the city can be reached by laser from the facility. I hope a hungry ambitious journalist goes and researches this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– brahbruh [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Re: timing of flashes, you're right, there are too fast to be a reflection, unless the windows had parabolic curves (which they wouldn't).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Primate98 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Actually, reflection off the window was exactly what I thought.

But I think this fire and all the other similar ones are definitely caused by DEWs. I hypothesize that they're something in the microwave range and thus generally invisible to the naked eye.

The most telling evidence I ever saw of this was the along the metal guardrail of a highway, the kind with wooden posts and those corrugated metal horizontal rails. Those thick-ass wooden posts, which would be so hard to set fire to, were burning on the surface, but only where they attached to the metal rails. A whole line of them like that. An effect of induced current, I would guess.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– brahbruh [S] 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

That's exactly the kind of shit that always catches me off guard with these suspicious fires; there's always some shit that shouldn't be burned that is and some shit that's not burned that definitely should be (like the trees in the melted neighborhood in the California "camp" fire).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Primate98 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Another easy and good category of things to look for in the remains of residential fires are large objects that would be impossible to vaporize no matter how much wood you piled up against it: refrigerators, washers and dryers, cast iron bathtubs, porcelain toilets and sinks. Can you imagine trying to burn any of those things away?

Also consider water heaters. Can you imagine a fire burning next to one long enough to boil off 55 gallons of water and then melt the vessel itself? C'mon, man! lol

All those things are standing in plain sight in normal fires. But you look at these suspicious fires and that shit is gone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– brahbruh [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Interesting. Same for the California fire - all those things were dust.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Clobro 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Electrical wires... Transformers...

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy