This direct flight from Sydney to Santiago de Chile would be impossible on a flat earth.
(www.flightconnections.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
The evidence does exist, just like the evidence which convicts innocent people or leads people to other incorrect (scientific or otherwise) conclusions/theories exists.
Claiming that such evidence doesn’t exist is silly, and plainly false. Claiming that the evidence which is purported to exist is wrong is a very different matter...
You don’t seem to be understanding what i’m saying. Perhaps re-reading it (assuming you are not a bot) may help.
Evidence is easy/trivial. Having it or not having it is largely meaningless. There are many examples (some of which i’ve already listed) in which evidence exists and the conclusions drawn from it are wrong.
Claiming that such evidence doesn’t exist, is both silly and wrong. There are many who claim that flight paths prove the world one shape or another. analysis of those flight paths (and diversions from them during emergencies) are their evidence - and that evidence obviously exists.
Again, you are missing the point. Having or lacking evidence doesn’t make you correct or incorrect. Besides, explanation/logic/reasoning - “long winded” or not - is evidence (or at least can be).
You can pat yourself on the back - declaring how right you are - in a silent room, all alone. However, you will not receive help from others to recognize when you are wrong (being which is both unavoidable, and frequent).
No, it does not. You are lying. It's obvious that you are lying because you are not presenting it. Instead, you make bullshit excuses for not showing it.
I’m not lying - you aren’t listening :(
You are claiming that you have evidence in flight details that the world must be spherical (or at least, can’t be flat). There are others who claim to have evidence from flight details that it is flat (and other shapes besides).
In my view, you both have evidence. And you are both misinterpreting it to come to flawed conclusions which don’t follow from the evidence.
That does NOT mean that you (or them) do not have evidence! You both have evidence! But that does not make either of you correct about the conclusions drawn from said evidence.
You’re just misunderstanding me. An argumentative approach/demeanor is never the right one when trying to effectively communicate. It only gets in the way.
Flat earthers have no evidence.
You are wrong for two main reasons.
Anyhow, the chip on your shoulder is called bias/prejudice and it makes objective study (and discussion) impossible. I recommend casting it aside if you can.