You are claiming that you have evidence in flight details that the world must be spherical (or at least, can’t be flat). There are others who claim to have evidence from flight details that it is flat (and other shapes besides).
In my view, you both have evidence. And you are both misinterpreting it to come to flawed conclusions which don’t follow from the evidence.
That does NOT mean that you (or them) do not have evidence! You both have evidence! But that does not make either of you correct about the conclusions drawn from said evidence.
you make bullshit excuses for not showing it.
You’re just misunderstanding me. An argumentative approach/demeanor is never the right one when trying to effectively communicate. It only gets in the way.
There aren’t any flat earthers - you have fallen for a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop.
Evidence is trivial. They have evidence just like you do. The flaws most often lie in the interpretation of the evidence, not the evidence itself.
Anyhow, the chip on your shoulder is called bias/prejudice and it makes objective study (and discussion) impossible. I recommend casting it aside if you can.
I’m not lying - you aren’t listening :(
You are claiming that you have evidence in flight details that the world must be spherical (or at least, can’t be flat). There are others who claim to have evidence from flight details that it is flat (and other shapes besides).
In my view, you both have evidence. And you are both misinterpreting it to come to flawed conclusions which don’t follow from the evidence.
That does NOT mean that you (or them) do not have evidence! You both have evidence! But that does not make either of you correct about the conclusions drawn from said evidence.
You’re just misunderstanding me. An argumentative approach/demeanor is never the right one when trying to effectively communicate. It only gets in the way.
Flat earthers have no evidence.
You are wrong for two main reasons.
Anyhow, the chip on your shoulder is called bias/prejudice and it makes objective study (and discussion) impossible. I recommend casting it aside if you can.