This direct flight from Sydney to Santiago de Chile would be impossible on a flat earth.
(www.flightconnections.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
So you want to believe.
Evidence is easy. There’s evidence available for almost anything, very much including things which are wrong/untrue. Just think about all the people who are wrongly convicted and sentenced for crimes they didn’t commit. Or virtually every scientific conclusion/belief of prior generations. Evidence abounds, but it doesn’t usually lead to truth (and often leads away from it).
You may disagree, or otherwise find fault with, their evidence - but they certainly have it (at least, as i said, ostensibly).
Then present it.
You won't because you know that it doesn't exist.
Present what? Have you not understood anything I’ve said?
Bots can’t understand what they read either :(
Do better if you can, and try responding to specific content!
I won’t because i don’t want to make you an even worse student than you already are. If you earnestly go looking for such evidence (of which there is, at least ostensibly, a lot) and fail then i’m happy to help you. Where have you tried looking? Or did you just assume and proclaim without doing any research at all ... :(
The evidence that you claim exists.
You wrote it yourself:
So, show it. You won't because there is no such evidence no matter how often you claim it.
I have literally predicted in another post that flat earthers will not present evidence, only claims, because they do not have evidence.
All they will do is make claims and then go into long-winded explanations why they will not present actual evidence.
And here you are, demonstrating how right I was.
The evidence does exist, just like the evidence which convicts innocent people or leads people to other incorrect (scientific or otherwise) conclusions/theories exists.
Claiming that such evidence doesn’t exist is silly, and plainly false. Claiming that the evidence which is purported to exist is wrong is a very different matter...
You don’t seem to be understanding what i’m saying. Perhaps re-reading it (assuming you are not a bot) may help.
Evidence is easy/trivial. Having it or not having it is largely meaningless. There are many examples (some of which i’ve already listed) in which evidence exists and the conclusions drawn from it are wrong.
Claiming that such evidence doesn’t exist, is both silly and wrong. There are many who claim that flight paths prove the world one shape or another. analysis of those flight paths (and diversions from them during emergencies) are their evidence - and that evidence obviously exists.
Again, you are missing the point. Having or lacking evidence doesn’t make you correct or incorrect. Besides, explanation/logic/reasoning - “long winded” or not - is evidence (or at least can be).
You can pat yourself on the back - declaring how right you are - in a silent room, all alone. However, you will not receive help from others to recognize when you are wrong (being which is both unavoidable, and frequent).