I would just like to comment as an individual that reads everything and has tracked this situation for some time; I am forced to positively conclude this is the ultimate goal as desired by the chosen peoples. Unfortunately.
After the Dutch and Brits developed the land and created infrastructure, then the bushfolk moved into the cities.
It's not necessarily international migration, but within the nation itself.
The lesson everyone is ignoring by pointing at purely skin tone is this: don't let people into your civil community if they aren't able to act in civility.
You're not special because they want your white ass dead. They want everyone dead, including their own weaponized pawns. Such a strange attitude from a group of people that claim to understand the true machinations of the world free from media bias.
Let’s take your retardation at face value and really explore the endgame of this particular theory. After “The Jews” finish “genociding white people” then what happens?
The above example shows the weaponization of majority (black) against minority (white). Ask yourself why jews can utilize majority against minority; while being less than the minority?
replacement
Response (re) to position (place) of mind/memory (ment)...why do the so called jews utilize maximum number of bodies (black) vs minimum number of bodies (white), when it's about "mind/memory"?
weaponization
WEAPON (instrument of offense)
IZE (verb denoting doing of noun)
ATION (action)
a) action generates reactions; sound generates instruments...ones "weapon of choice" represents reacting instrument within enacting sound.
b) VERB (denotes action) doesn't generate NOUN (name; word that denotes a thing)...others utilize their weapon of choice to suggest nouns; names; brands; idols; fiction etc. which they do VERBALLY (speech aka spell-craft).
You should look into South Africa's early history. It was a desolate waste that White settlers turned into a prosperous nation. And then the bantu hordes came.
a) waste (inception towards death) turned into prosperous (life)...those alive are being tricked to view their surrounding as waste instead of opportunity.
b) others suggest "settling down" to distract from being (life) dissolved (inception towards death) within; which implies ones need of resistance.
c) whatever one builds tempts others to want it. One needs to resist want, hence need to let go over want to hold onto.
For example...giving a fox access to ones chicken coop shapes the fox into a weaker predator, while protecting ones coop inspires a predator to adapt, hence growing more efficient.
d) nation implies "a people"...not their position. Why are the "white" people so weak? Because they believe in white nations; in white communities; in white societies...in other words...they were tricked to attach themselves to suggested umbrellas (national-ism; commune-ism and social-ism).
e) what if he-brew his-story and jew fell for it? The many are being tricked to hold onto a suggested "history" that only a few define; redefine and contradict at will, hence writing the narratives as they go, while the many follow along stumbling over themselves.
f) bantu aka BA (plural prefix) NTU (person)...person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies singular aka from whole (sound) into partials (instruments).
Others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self. It ain't "we the people"; it's each one within all.
I would just like to comment as an individual that reads everything and has tracked this situation for some time; I am forced to positively conclude this is the ultimate goal as desired by the chosen peoples. Unfortunately.
Was south Africa taking in mass migrants? I thought it was always majority black?
After the Dutch and Brits developed the land and created infrastructure, then the bushfolk moved into the cities.
It's not necessarily international migration, but within the nation itself.
The lesson everyone is ignoring by pointing at purely skin tone is this: don't let people into your civil community if they aren't able to act in civility.
You're not special because they want your white ass dead. They want everyone dead, including their own weaponized pawns. Such a strange attitude from a group of people that claim to understand the true machinations of the world free from media bias.
Yes
Let’s take your retardation at face value and really explore the endgame of this particular theory. After “The Jews” finish “genociding white people” then what happens?
The above example shows the weaponization of majority (black) against minority (white). Ask yourself why jews can utilize majority against minority; while being less than the minority?
Response (re) to position (place) of mind/memory (ment)...why do the so called jews utilize maximum number of bodies (black) vs minimum number of bodies (white), when it's about "mind/memory"?
a) action generates reactions; sound generates instruments...ones "weapon of choice" represents reacting instrument within enacting sound.
b) VERB (denotes action) doesn't generate NOUN (name; word that denotes a thing)...others utilize their weapon of choice to suggest nouns; names; brands; idols; fiction etc. which they do VERBALLY (speech aka spell-craft).
You should look into South Africa's early history. It was a desolate waste that White settlers turned into a prosperous nation. And then the bantu hordes came.
a) waste (inception towards death) turned into prosperous (life)...those alive are being tricked to view their surrounding as waste instead of opportunity.
b) others suggest "settling down" to distract from being (life) dissolved (inception towards death) within; which implies ones need of resistance.
c) whatever one builds tempts others to want it. One needs to resist want, hence need to let go over want to hold onto.
For example...giving a fox access to ones chicken coop shapes the fox into a weaker predator, while protecting ones coop inspires a predator to adapt, hence growing more efficient.
d) nation implies "a people"...not their position. Why are the "white" people so weak? Because they believe in white nations; in white communities; in white societies...in other words...they were tricked to attach themselves to suggested umbrellas (national-ism; commune-ism and social-ism).
e) what if he-brew his-story and jew fell for it? The many are being tricked to hold onto a suggested "history" that only a few define; redefine and contradict at will, hence writing the narratives as they go, while the many follow along stumbling over themselves.
f) bantu aka BA (plural prefix) NTU (person)...person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies singular aka from whole (sound) into partials (instruments).
Others suggest pluralism (we) to distract singular (one) from self. It ain't "we the people"; it's each one within all.