At this point it doesn't make it factual. Not without her sworn statements.
Kids write all kind of bullshit. Without stating otherwise. Her diary doesn't mean the content is fact. Only that she wrote it. Until she states otherwise, it's fiction. But obviously it's significant. Enough to call on courts, or investigations.
Here it is a nothing burger. It's enough to throw mud with. Campaigning. But not enough for anybody else to blink. It'll gain a few more hits in the rallies.
Read it. She'll admit it was a phase of teenage trauma. As her worth is worth more today.
She's a psychologist, social worker. It'll be easy for the left to dampen this, and for her to produce all the usual fiction. Teenage childhood fantasies. She already stating otherwise.
In fact hadn't this clip surfaced, it would be easier for her to deny. The source was compromised. She still might.
Look she's denying it. Is set to construct an approved biography of her childhood. It is rallying around her family. Despite of all the contrary images, journals, and paper trails being burnt.
How is somebody rationalising, FBI. It makes you dumb. Like on the same level as a drug addled crackhead paranoid schizo. A blathering retarded junkie.
It is as I said. Until she produces a statement confirming the fictious log took place, it's nothing but hearsay. Damaging if it gets more hits to the larger public. The police might interview her. Secret service are. But they're often acting on presidential interests. It's often silencing it.
So flip the odds.
She's either a liar, junkie, delusional, and that was a work of teenage fiction. Or it's gonna get real messy.
As it hasn't hit major tabloids, go on, rather it's just more campaigning mud. Tells us where the odds are? It might, but it would take further investigations and her sworn statements. Then after presidency, office, it might get indicted if impeachment proceedings haven't seized on it. But until then it's hearsay. The odds aren't particularly favourable. Perhaps she would've had this conversation already?
Have a guess, a lot of this, topic, and likewise has been filed under impeachment. Hunter Biden, the laptop. The payments. Character. It's a special counsel investigating it. It doesn't affect much outside of later campaigning. Where it's still under the gun what occurs.
At this point it doesn't make it factual. Not without her sworn statements.
Kids write all kind of bullshit. Without stating otherwise. Her diary doesn't mean the content is fact. Only that she wrote it. Until she states otherwise, it's fiction. But obviously it's significant. Enough to call on courts, or investigations.
She's 42.
Here it is a nothing burger. It's enough to throw mud with. Campaigning. But not enough for anybody else to blink. It'll gain a few more hits in the rallies.
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/03/politics/ashley-biden-white-house/index.html
Read it. She'll admit it was a phase of teenage trauma. As her worth is worth more today.
She's a psychologist, social worker. It'll be easy for the left to dampen this, and for her to produce all the usual fiction. Teenage childhood fantasies. She already stating otherwise.
In fact hadn't this clip surfaced, it would be easier for her to deny. The source was compromised. She still might.
Look she's denying it. Is set to construct an approved biography of her childhood. It is rallying around her family. Despite of all the contrary images, journals, and paper trails being burnt.
You're dumber than you look.
How is somebody rationalising, FBI. It makes you dumb. Like on the same level as a drug addled crackhead paranoid schizo. A blathering retarded junkie.
It is as I said. Until she produces a statement confirming the fictious log took place, it's nothing but hearsay. Damaging if it gets more hits to the larger public. The police might interview her. Secret service are. But they're often acting on presidential interests. It's often silencing it.
So flip the odds.
She's either a liar, junkie, delusional, and that was a work of teenage fiction. Or it's gonna get real messy.
As it hasn't hit major tabloids, go on, rather it's just more campaigning mud. Tells us where the odds are? It might, but it would take further investigations and her sworn statements. Then after presidency, office, it might get indicted if impeachment proceedings haven't seized on it. But until then it's hearsay. The odds aren't particularly favourable. Perhaps she would've had this conversation already?
Have a guess, a lot of this, topic, and likewise has been filed under impeachment. Hunter Biden, the laptop. The payments. Character. It's a special counsel investigating it. It doesn't affect much outside of later campaigning. Where it's still under the gun what occurs.