The Rabbi used a bunch of extra biblical texts and satanic fan fiction to come up with that narrative. The Bible lays out very strict criteria who the man of sin is and the Roman Catholic Papacy is the only entity that fits all the criteria. You also have to remember that when the Bible was written, there was no distinction between Jews and Christians. When Jesus says “Synagogue of Satan” or talks about “fake Jews” this terminology is referring to false followers of Yaweh. They will claim to be Christian but will have no real fellowship with God. This is why Jesus says He will tell them to turn away and that He never knew them.
The glaring flaw with your interpretation is that it doesn’t let the Bible speak for itself and instead relies on satanic writings as a source.
It didn't take you long to give disinformation agent a Bible quote about the Antichrist. LOL
It's pretty easy to prove them wrong. Time and time again.
There was one on Reddit who made a comment about the Nazis and Hitler wanting to "exterminate all the Jews". Who then said I was being "immoral" (no joke) for bringing up the Haavara Agreement, where Hitler agreed WITH Jews to send the rich Jews to Palestine (with all their possessions no less...probably robbed Germany blind).
That is not wanting to "exterminate all the Jews".
Ask any shill why the "Nazis" in Ukraine just don't kill Zelensky. There's no good answer.
Ever see the video of Zelensky with Marina Abramovic, dedicating the bizarre black wall with giant chunks of quartz in it to Ukrainian Jews killed during the Holocaust?
Basically ties EVERYTHING together. If you look at my posts, it's the fourth one down (I don't post a lot).
No. It's a narrative. The simplest narrative ever used.
What's an antichrist everything unchristian or ungodly. Simple ain't it.
The way battle is conducted represents the 4 horseman. It's the same paradigm. The horses follow each other, heralding each other, God's army eventually wins, it was reminiscent of seige warfare. But it is a narrative doomed to repeat itself. It specifically recollects from Babylon.
There is nothing more to it. It can be woven into many events. Because it simply connects as prophesied when it's simple repetition. It can be orchestrated or adopted into practice.
Check out the trump666 subreddit. There's a lot of connections. "little horn", the Abraham Accords, etc etc etc
Also Philip K. Dick thought he was the return of Elijah. I believe that Robert Crumb even made a cartoon out of his experience with it.
I had two funny thoughts about it...First that some people do consider Philip K. Dick to be prophetic, and secondly, I just wondered if Dick had any connection to Trump. It'd be funny if he did.
BTW, Epoch there called me the biggest piece of human excrement on the planet. LOL I'd take his opinions with a grain of salt.
I'm going to look more into the Philip K. Dick thing and Trump when I have the time.
Dick has an essay about how to make the universe so that it doesn't fall apart "two days later".
It's really dense, but worth the read. There's a good part towards the end about Logos, "logos", and brand names. Even a pretty touching anecdote about his son and the use of fish imagery in Christianity.
Nope. The only realism is realising it was a paradigm for seige warfare destined to repeat itself every seige against those who considered themselves godly. Similarly applied to warfare. It isn't prophetic just nuance and surrealism. It could've even been taken out of the Bhagavad Gita, Summerian tablets, originally. Because it repeats itself seamlessly. It reworded with simple nuance.
Until it could've been talking about the seige of Constantinople. Babylon. The destruction of Jerusalem. Rome. Countless times over.
An antichrist was everybody heathen. The head of those was Satan himself. Or the antichrist.
The events causing warfare were the horsemen enacting the beseiged.
The Rabbi used a bunch of extra biblical texts and satanic fan fiction to come up with that narrative. The Bible lays out very strict criteria who the man of sin is and the Roman Catholic Papacy is the only entity that fits all the criteria. You also have to remember that when the Bible was written, there was no distinction between Jews and Christians. When Jesus says “Synagogue of Satan” or talks about “fake Jews” this terminology is referring to false followers of Yaweh. They will claim to be Christian but will have no real fellowship with God. This is why Jesus says He will tell them to turn away and that He never knew them.
The glaring flaw with your interpretation is that it doesn’t let the Bible speak for itself and instead relies on satanic writings as a source.
Here’s a video that gives a quick rundown: https://youtu.be/-kG7sFvwwbE
I challenge you to post the bible quotes mentioning "antichrist".
LOL that didn't take long.
It didn't take you long to give disinformation agent a Bible quote about the Antichrist. LOL
It's pretty easy to prove them wrong. Time and time again.
There was one on Reddit who made a comment about the Nazis and Hitler wanting to "exterminate all the Jews". Who then said I was being "immoral" (no joke) for bringing up the Haavara Agreement, where Hitler agreed WITH Jews to send the rich Jews to Palestine (with all their possessions no less...probably robbed Germany blind).
That is not wanting to "exterminate all the Jews".
Ask any shill why the "Nazis" in Ukraine just don't kill Zelensky. There's no good answer.
Ever see the video of Zelensky with Marina Abramovic, dedicating the bizarre black wall with giant chunks of quartz in it to Ukrainian Jews killed during the Holocaust?
Basically ties EVERYTHING together. If you look at my posts, it's the fourth one down (I don't post a lot).
IF there was any Holocaust, it was probably of anyone who wouldn't "get with the program", Jewish or otherwise. Help with the Zionist cause or else.
A big giveaway is Yiddish, because the fake Jews didn't know proper Hebrew and had to learn it.
Nancy Pelosi's father was mayor of Baltimore, and learned Yiddish so he could talk better with his "betters". No joke.
There's more.
I don't think he was a Jew and belief in hell is a childish masochistic fantasy.
Why are you telling me this? Why should I care?
No. It's a narrative. The simplest narrative ever used.
What's an antichrist everything unchristian or ungodly. Simple ain't it.
The way battle is conducted represents the 4 horseman. It's the same paradigm. The horses follow each other, heralding each other, God's army eventually wins, it was reminiscent of seige warfare. But it is a narrative doomed to repeat itself. It specifically recollects from Babylon.
There is nothing more to it. It can be woven into many events. Because it simply connects as prophesied when it's simple repetition. It can be orchestrated or adopted into practice.
There ain't no other magic to it.
Check out the trump666 subreddit. There's a lot of connections. "little horn", the Abraham Accords, etc etc etc
Also Philip K. Dick thought he was the return of Elijah. I believe that Robert Crumb even made a cartoon out of his experience with it.
I had two funny thoughts about it...First that some people do consider Philip K. Dick to be prophetic, and secondly, I just wondered if Dick had any connection to Trump. It'd be funny if he did.
BTW, Epoch there called me the biggest piece of human excrement on the planet. LOL I'd take his opinions with a grain of salt.
I'm going to look more into the Philip K. Dick thing and Trump when I have the time.
Dick has an essay about how to make the universe so that it doesn't fall apart "two days later".
It's really dense, but worth the read. There's a good part towards the end about Logos, "logos", and brand names. Even a pretty touching anecdote about his son and the use of fish imagery in Christianity.
Nope. The only realism is realising it was a paradigm for seige warfare destined to repeat itself every seige against those who considered themselves godly. Similarly applied to warfare. It isn't prophetic just nuance and surrealism. It could've even been taken out of the Bhagavad Gita, Summerian tablets, originally. Because it repeats itself seamlessly. It reworded with simple nuance.
Until it could've been talking about the seige of Constantinople. Babylon. The destruction of Jerusalem. Rome. Countless times over.
An antichrist was everybody heathen. The head of those was Satan himself. Or the antichrist.
The events causing warfare were the horsemen enacting the beseiged.