No. It's a narrative. The simplest narrative ever used.
What's an antichrist everything unchristian or ungodly. Simple ain't it.
The way battle is conducted represents the 4 horseman. It's the same paradigm. The horses follow each other, heralding each other, God's army eventually wins, it was reminiscent of seige warfare. But it is a narrative doomed to repeat itself. It specifically recollects from Babylon.
There is nothing more to it. It can be woven into many events. Because it simply connects as prophesied when it's simple repetition. It can be orchestrated or adopted into practice.
Check out the trump666 subreddit. There's a lot of connections. "little horn", the Abraham Accords, etc etc etc
Also Philip K. Dick thought he was the return of Elijah. I believe that Robert Crumb even made a cartoon out of his experience with it.
I had two funny thoughts about it...First that some people do consider Philip K. Dick to be prophetic, and secondly, I just wondered if Dick had any connection to Trump. It'd be funny if he did.
BTW, Epoch there called me the biggest piece of human excrement on the planet. LOL I'd take his opinions with a grain of salt.
I'm going to look more into the Philip K. Dick thing and Trump when I have the time.
Dick has an essay about how to make the universe so that it doesn't fall apart "two days later".
It's really dense, but worth the read. There's a good part towards the end about Logos, "logos", and brand names. Even a pretty touching anecdote about his son and the use of fish imagery in Christianity.
Nope. The only realism is realising it was a paradigm for seige warfare destined to repeat itself every seige against those who considered themselves godly. Similarly applied to warfare. It isn't prophetic just nuance and surrealism. It could've even been taken out of the Bhagavad Gita, Summerian tablets, originally. Because it repeats itself seamlessly. It reworded with simple nuance.
Until it could've been talking about the seige of Constantinople. Babylon. The destruction of Jerusalem. Rome. Countless times over.
An antichrist was everybody heathen. The head of those was Satan himself. Or the antichrist.
The events causing warfare were the horsemen enacting the beseiged.
No. It's a narrative. The simplest narrative ever used.
What's an antichrist everything unchristian or ungodly. Simple ain't it.
The way battle is conducted represents the 4 horseman. It's the same paradigm. The horses follow each other, heralding each other, God's army eventually wins, it was reminiscent of seige warfare. But it is a narrative doomed to repeat itself. It specifically recollects from Babylon.
There is nothing more to it. It can be woven into many events. Because it simply connects as prophesied when it's simple repetition. It can be orchestrated or adopted into practice.
There ain't no other magic to it.
Check out the trump666 subreddit. There's a lot of connections. "little horn", the Abraham Accords, etc etc etc
Also Philip K. Dick thought he was the return of Elijah. I believe that Robert Crumb even made a cartoon out of his experience with it.
I had two funny thoughts about it...First that some people do consider Philip K. Dick to be prophetic, and secondly, I just wondered if Dick had any connection to Trump. It'd be funny if he did.
BTW, Epoch there called me the biggest piece of human excrement on the planet. LOL I'd take his opinions with a grain of salt.
I'm going to look more into the Philip K. Dick thing and Trump when I have the time.
Dick has an essay about how to make the universe so that it doesn't fall apart "two days later".
It's really dense, but worth the read. There's a good part towards the end about Logos, "logos", and brand names. Even a pretty touching anecdote about his son and the use of fish imagery in Christianity.
Nope. The only realism is realising it was a paradigm for seige warfare destined to repeat itself every seige against those who considered themselves godly. Similarly applied to warfare. It isn't prophetic just nuance and surrealism. It could've even been taken out of the Bhagavad Gita, Summerian tablets, originally. Because it repeats itself seamlessly. It reworded with simple nuance.
Until it could've been talking about the seige of Constantinople. Babylon. The destruction of Jerusalem. Rome. Countless times over.
An antichrist was everybody heathen. The head of those was Satan himself. Or the antichrist.
The events causing warfare were the horsemen enacting the beseiged.