12 () posted 1 year ago by BuckeyePatr1ot 1 year ago by BuckeyePatr1ot +13 / -1 32 comments share 32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
I agree that the seal imagery can be revealing. However, the details are in the cuneiform Sumerian.
Anton Parks didn't take a no for an answer or accept the High Academic Degree entry card.
He did the translations himself.
So did Mauro Biglino.
The results did not go through / via the gatekepers of knowledge.
Also, GNN translations work if we have ground truth to compare to, during training. If not, it can be just as gobbledygook as Sitchin.
And we don't have that ground truth for Sumerian, which died as a language a few thousand years ago and for wich no big enough Rosetta stone exists.