And, if not, how will they justify it? WWIII? Or go ahead with an election under a "new virus" to allow for cheating?
Or something else entirely?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
I completely agree, but they don't have absolute control - they're not gods. I really do believe that they wanted Hillary to win in 2016, for instance. And they woke a lot of people up with the blatant cheating in 2020. I'm torn on Trump, but it's clear that the establishment don't want him.
Nah. You saw how fast Hillary conceded. It's just good cop bad cop.
If trump was an actual threat, he would have committed suicide long ago.
She conceded because if they fought to count votes, their scam would have been uncovered. They went extra hard in 2020 by muddying the courts and cranking up the propaganda, ensuring they could steal it.
They did enough to make you believe it.
a) entrance (inception) towards outcome (death) implies life wielding free will of choice (elect; eligio; to choose) as resistance.
b) selecting others by consenting to suggested elections gives them the power of ones consent to restrict (control) ones free will of choice...voting represents a self imposed restriction.
In other words...the few suggest different outcomes to tempt the many to ignore predefined outcome for everyone. Aiming at something different; while ignoring the same natural order gives others control over ones "destiny". Those who follow orders willingly ignore natural order, hence lacking comprehension about what goes on.