UFO hearing with US congress
(www.space.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
The problem is it didn't reveal much. There was further Speculation. I forget the specifics. Enough to cause conjecture. There was something a little bit more noteworthy that wasn't in other releases.
But honestly, the narrative is as it always was. Anything else has no paper trail. If it was filed, it went whoosh.
Like that pilot, in the hearing, where is the report and radar readings of the jamming. But come on. It could as easily be, oohhhhh. Projection.
Besides the current drones have that capability. No, not quite, prototypes. Then, perhaps not. But with radar jamming, and even beam weapons, emp, satellite killers, or potential counter missiles, shutting down electronics. Vertical thrust. They're even making them to be able to be launched by subs. They can fly, and potentially submerge, and re-entry, hitting hypersonic.
We don't agree because I understand this is a process. I read the steps a few times, but doubt I understand it enough to explain.
What we saw set other steps in place. I do not think the public will see all of those steps. Think of the hearing as a prerequisite. Now we have to wait.
Hahaha. No. The Pentagon has denied Gursch's spurious claims. It means they have to drag the named parties into their closed hearings, what documents, which clearance, what warrants if contractors, and if they can compromise somebody else, perhaps.
Gursch at this point has made claims. None of them are substantiated or verified. He has assumed, hasn't seen, off supposed reports.
What there is from this was calls for better radar oversight and a dedicated chain of command, hotline, for reporting supposed UAPs.
6th gen is nearly on the battlefield. These are fighters and drone/drones 1 to 3 alongside the aircraft.
What there was, was a bunch of projection. America has already supposedly developed 6th gen, and is currently working on 7th gen.
Research it. You'll find your UAPs. Without the fiction writers
You keep making assumptions about my opinion. First, I'm a fan of Walter Bosley( break away civilizations), and Dr. Joseph P. Farrell ( Cosmic War)
Just because they're called unknown doesn make them actually unknown.
It could mean AI. But he said biological non human. It was in that report where they made the pigeon bombs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pigeon .Joke.
6th gen is almost fully AI. The pilot wears a VR headset. Like presumably the current drone programs?
Come on fiction sells. You're getting way ahead of yourself. Sure I'd like it as well. But it ain't.
Think. At what point is there Wakanda? At what point is our airspace being breached by advanced beings. Why. The idea isn't to reveal yourself. If you are, it's because you want or need something. It historically isn't peace. It's control.
So it is why every statement contradicted the previous. They're detected on Radar. But they're Radar jamming. They're unmatched by our technology and capability, but we've captured them and are reverse engineering them.
It's a script prompting funding calling for clarity by another funded agency having control over current threats evolving. I.E, so on radar. It pings a UAP. They don't shit a brick reporting it to the press. They ring the hotline. It knows what it is. If it's hostile they can dispatch the space police.
Or convince me otherwise. Convince me how everything history religion science origin needs revisioning. How our governments are infiltrated.