5G or even 4 or 3G to the nearest tower requires more RF power than a nanochip in the body could put out, and there would be no good antenna with which to transmit. I am familiar with low-power IoT chips for products and they still need a physical battery (not a bio-derived one). Conceivably one could use a pulsed scheme where an accumulator is charged up enough over time to send a brief comm burst but the problem is the RF signal from a transmitting antenna within a wet environment would be very very weak relative to RF noise in the general environment. 5G towers can't pick up that very weak signal.
There is no way anyone is able to put a 500 MHz CPU into a nanochip inside a body because even with ultra low power and especially with ultra low power you can't run a half GHz clock. My guess is any nanochip CPUs run at khz speeds at best, because there is no way to get enough energy out of a bio-based battery.
It might be the guy is not lying but simply was taken by fake data.
All the stories about Bluetooth IDs being detected in vaxxed people involve a very close radio - no way can the ID be read at a distance - Bluetooth is inherently very close range and not to a 5G tower at all.
So too many pieces are not right here. It's a boogeyman story is all it is.
How close is their cell phone to them? And don't people pass near towers all the time every day? So how hard would it be to grab data from some small chip? I don't think very difficult.
I don't believe what they say.
It might be the guy is not lying but simply was taken by fake data.
All the stories about Bluetooth IDs being detected in vaxxed people involve a very close radio - no way can the ID be read at a distance - Bluetooth is inherently very close range and not to a 5G tower at all.
So too many pieces are not right here. It's a boogeyman story is all it is.
How close is their cell phone to them? And don't people pass near towers all the time every day? So how hard would it be to grab data from some small chip? I don't think very difficult.