Suddenly, Santa Claus is perfectly real person. St. Nikolaus (Άγιος Νικόλαος) was a Greek who lived in Likiya aorund 270-345 AD. He was archbishop of town of Mira, Likiya (now Demre, Turkey). Known for miracles and kindness. Also, it is known that on one of ecumenical councils he effectively closed rant of heretic Ares (Ἄρειος, account him as modern liberal :) ) with a direct punch into the Ares face. Perfect example to follow today, meanwhile.

In Western culrure he become Santa Claus for the story when St. Nikolaus tried to help a family in need who was ready to even sell three daughters to avoid their starvation. Nikolaus trying to be unnoticed periodically throw a small bag with coins into family house window, and once this bag landed in a sock that was drying near stove. Father of family wanted to know who is his savior once caught Nikolaus and was amased that so high priest helping poor family. Nikolaus asked him to keep that in secret.

So, that "Santa Claus does not exist" narrative is false. He existed physically, and if you are a Christian, you should believe in the life after death and Saints, so St. Nikolaus AKA Santa Claus is perfectly real person and he is alive for every Christian.

Interesting, that this "Santa Claus does not exist" narrative is devoted to eliminate a character of St, Nikolaus from the tradition, but not a rithual of Christmas gifts. Think why. :)

a) Latin clausula "the end, a closing, termination"...others utilize suggestion to tempt one into STIPULATION, noun - "agreeing and covenanting; a contracting or bargaining" aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...a clause upon ones life sentence.

b) Hebrew satan "adversary, one who plots against another" represents the temptation for oneself to ignore perceivable for the suggestions by others.

If choice (reaction) ignores balance (action) for the choices of others, then that represents an ADVERSE reaction...ignorance represents ones adversary.

c) IN (being within) NOCEO (harm) aka being within (life) harms way (inception towards death).

Bonus...if the status quo of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents innocence, then what does "until proven guilty" imply?

so why not...

Because aka "being within cause" implies being within everything...suggested nothing represents ones ignorance of everything perceivable if consented to.

so why not remain

Asking others for suggested answers tempts one to ignore RE (response to) MAIN (that which has most power in producing an effect) aka perceivable origin. That's why.

as long as possible

Potential (possibility) can only exist within momentum of motion aka within perceivable moment aka "now". Only one within momentum can choose to measure length by holding onto measuring points.

The want to hold onto tempts one to ignore need to let go of perceivable. Measuring motion isn't for defining length, but to sustain self as the temporary within ongoing motion.

Try this...can anyone alive measure ones life while lacking the whole extent (inception towards death) of it?

Overvaluing a particular neurotransmitter. You want your child to be what, happy? As in, you want a big load of serotonin and dopamine in their brain? Why? Because it's pleasant.

I'd rather my child be safe and survivable than happy, in most cases.