Substack links the bad guys to Sound Of Freedom movie
(open.substack.com)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Is the movie doing more good than harm for the kidnapped kids?
they didn't just start allowing the film to be made. First the Disney wouldn't sell to them. They got blocked out of the theaters. Then they experimented using indie Christian films on how to crowdsource and advertise a film. Finally they created a new financial model that they are actually getting copyrighted/trademarked in order to get the movie in theaters.
yes, Ballard is a Mormon and worked for the three letter agencies. Then he left. I would assume his allegiances are different than most people. But at the end of the day, this movie probably raises awareness and helps people.
yes, many many people in the three letter agencies are Mormons and that is known in the Mormon community as a source of pride. They are allegedly chosen because they don't drink or smoke and can't be blackmailed and have integrity.
I think Mormons are chosen because they are blindly obedient to authority. They don't question the motives of their leaders.
When you're wrestling in the mud, you're bound to get a little messy. I'm not seeing seeing anything here that suggests this movie is duplicitous out that Ballard is somehow compromised. All I see is connections to people who are. Are there any in: Hollywood who aren't? If not then how would one ever create a movie without rubbing shoulders with them?
Why would it now be allowed to show it to the people? It was once suppressed and with all the censorship in the world today especially these past few years why has it been allowed to view to the masses today? Do you think that money will help solve the issue or do you think it will make parents aware and desperate of the issue and microchip their kids to help "prevent" this? Freemasons are funding this new outreach program in multiple states. What is the history of the freemasons ans should people trust them? Not everything is innocent and evil is slicker than you and I think but I see it. Safe and effective. Remember.
Not only that, this movie is getting publicity like crazy. There's no way the CIA and their media lackeys are unacquainted with the Streisand effect
You are asking the right questions. I have been having similar thoughts. I have no idea about Ballard, or Cavaziel or Gibson or the director, but the question of why are they allowing it, especially after suppressing this stuff for so long.
I've seen what look like ops on other sites pushing narratives around needing to prove your kids are yours and not some random kids that you kidnapped. They are trying to scare parents into digital ID of some kind (maybe using chips, as you stated). They are coming at it from all angles - virus/vaccine tracking, cyber attacks and disinformation policing, stopping "dangerous" views that disagree with the manufactured mainstream, keep your kids safe, etc.
People get over stuff (like the covid tyranny) and afraid to think just how evil those with power are but also just want to "get back to how things were" and so they either declare premature victory or stick their heads in the sand. It doesn't change the fact that this is the goal of those in power: a global system with absolute tracking and control.
Nothing is going to stop them from pursing this system, and they have been planning and implementing it for decades. We are just at the end exponential acceleration (which is why it seems fast and all of a sudden). They are not going to stop.
(I feel like a broken record but the only way to beat it is to not play their game, not be dependent on their system, build local networks of like-minded people that are as independent of the system as they can be, build regional coalitions of these networks for trade, passage, survival, etc. You can't beat them at their own game where they can change the rules at will, you need to play a different game. And don't get complacent when it seems like they have let up or given up, because they haven't.)
Good questions esp the ones about that free masons are up to. My best guess is they're using fear to sell global ID and also deflecting their culpability If applicable
fwiw, i don't think Jim Caviezel would be involved if Ballard was dirty.
I dont think we know these people at all. Matter of fact I know I don't. The fact that Ballard is a freemason and you understand the dark history of freemasons and the chip program they have in place for young children I wouldn't trust it.
Just because we would never do such and evil thing doesn't mean these people haven't and are not. Satan's rabbits are everywhere even propped up as light bearing and saviors.
Tell me about the chip program
GA, TN, CT and a few other states have set up a program to help protect children by collecting their DNA and chipping them to locate them if they happen to get snatched up by stranger dangers. Most if not all of these programs are backed by freemasons. Sadly, many parents will line right up and get their kid(s) chipped under the guise of preventative and safety measurew when in reality it's the opposite.
It's worth looking into if you have the time but it's been rolled out already.
In the old days you took your ass to sears for a free picture and fake ass passport looking booklet pfft.
https://open.substack.com/pub/anonfamous/p/the-tim-ballard-rabbit-hole?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Solid points. Where are the lies in this substack?
More like "why do I care about anything in this substack?"
Basically, what I got from this was "no jews were involved in the making of this movie", so I'm good.
Tim Ballard and Jim Caviezel are controlled oppositions.
People forget that to get to that level these actors and people in the Hollywood machine make a blood oath. You don't get to these levels without selling their souls to get on the big screen and idc if the guy played Jesus Christ on the big screen in Passions. Doesn't make him holy for making weak pleas for help and speaking out against blood consumption. Adrenachrome or whatever.
Do you know that Jim Caviezel's Jesus has one eye open when the Jesus character has been beaten and put in trial scenes?
I did not know that. Very interesting