Gettin some info:
There is some information about this topic, but it is not entirely accurate to say that Bill Gates wants to block the sun to curb global warming. Here are some facts and sources that may help you understand the issue better:
Bill Gates is one of the funders of a research project called Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), which is led by Harvard University scientists12.
The project aims to study the effects of spraying non-toxic calcium carbonate (CaCO 3) dust into the upper atmosphere, which could potentially reflect some of the sun’s rays and cool the planet134.
The project is not trying to block or dim the sun, but rather to modify the solar radiation that reaches Earth’s surface35. This is a form of solar geoengineering, which is a controversial and hypothetical idea to counteract global warming by altering the Earth’s energy balance3.
The project has not yet conducted any outdoor experiments, but plans to do so in June 2023 near Kiruna, Sweden, with a balloon carrying scientific equipment 12 miles (20 km) high13. The experiment will not release any CaCO 3 dust, but will test the balloon’s maneuverability and communication systems13.
The project is not a substitute for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but rather a possible last-ditch effort to slow down the heating of the planet if emissions mitigation and adaptation fail13. The project acknowledges that there are many unknown risks and uncertainties associated with solar geoengineering, such as changes in weather patterns, ozone depletion, and ethical and governance challenges132.
Learn more:
- forbes.com
- snopes.com
- politico.com
- newsweek.com
- usatoday.com +1 more
No. Changing one factor doesn't mean the other does not exist.
But, what it would do, is hide the stars. As there is something wrong with the nights sky, and there always has been.
No matter the season we have only one nights sky, regardless to your location on this planet. At least in the area we are allowed to exist that is.
What if oneself can be tricked to hold onto factor while ignoring existing?
What if suggestion represents the factor negotiating with ones consent?
Thread Derailment
Disinformation
prep for micronova. (((they))) think they can mitigate some of the effects.
a) does anything the few are doing draw the many closer to them?
b) a permission implies given...what is it that the few are giving, while taking everything from the many?
c) what does a suggested "permission to enter" represent for those inside everything perceivable aka those inside everything reality has to offer?
EX (expression) PER (by) MENT (mind/memory)...ones consent to the suggestions by others implies an expression by ones mind/memory; it implies shaping the suggested into a perturbation, hence agitating ones mind/memory, and it implies giving those suggesting control over the suggested.
a) being one implies being separated from other ones; which implies a foundation (whole) which separates itself (partials) internally.
b) whatever others are suggesting can only distract one from the perceivable foundation, hence the suggested tower of babel keep collapsing; while the foundation remains intact.
c) FUND, noun (Hebrew; to build) - "foundation"...one can build a "foundation" for a house only on another foundation. The artificial foundation (suggestion) tempts one to ignore the natural foundation (perception).
The suggested word "foundation" tempts one to ignore the perceivable foundation for all words...sound.
Thread Derailment
Intentionally Inaccurate Reply
Disinformation