Cryo-EM is Cryogenic Electron Microscopy. Samples for Cryo-EM prepared on metal grids covered with non-metal conductive material. Usially it is copper grids covered with graphite. Some manufacturers have gold grids covered with graphene oxide for those who want to look cool, rich and successfull among colleaugues. It is like CasioF91W watch and Rolex. Both are perfectly precise but if you think you care about your image you buy Rolex to impress others.
Elecron microscopy samples could not be used in production. Samples are unuseable after making micrographs in electron microscope. So it does not matter what is the coating of EM grids - graphite, graphene oxide or Svarowsky diamond dust. It can't be in product after EM of production samples.
Again same bullshit back.
Cryo-EM is Cryogenic Electron Microscopy. Samples for Cryo-EM prepared on metal grids covered with non-metal conductive material. Usially it is copper grids covered with graphite. Some manufacturers have gold grids covered with graphene oxide for those who want to look cool, rich and successfull among colleaugues. It is like CasioF91W watch and Rolex. Both are perfectly precise but if you think you care about your image you buy Rolex to impress others.
Elecron microscopy samples could not be used in production. Samples are unuseable after making micrographs in electron microscope. So it does not matter what is the coating of EM grids - graphite, graphene oxide or Svarowsky diamond dust. It can't be in product after EM of production samples.
I already wrote about exactly same quotes from same paper - https://conspiracies.win/p/16ami9FpWH/x/c/4TsZfsxyc7M
Seems nobody cares. And nobody bother to question anyything.
Bingo. It confirms a bias therefore it must be true.