Cryo-EM is Cryogenic Electron Microscopy. Samples for Cryo-EM prepared on metal grids covered with non-metal conductive material. Usially it is copper grids covered with graphite. Some manufacturers have gold grids covered with graphene oxide for those who want to look cool, rich and successfull among colleaugues. It is like CasioF91W watch and Rolex. Both are perfectly precise but if you think you care about your image you buy Rolex to impress others.
Elecron microscopy samples could not be used in production. Samples are unuseable after making micrographs in electron microscope. So it does not matter what is the coating of EM grids - graphite, graphene oxide or Svarowsky diamond dust. It can't be in product after EM of production samples.
Why the fuck are you so pro-vaccine, champ? You have a shit- ton of research yet to do if you don't know about the dubious nature of viruses (at least as they are portrayed vs. what they actually are) and I can tell you FROM EXPERIENCE having spent about a solid week going through MIT slides that all of the "virus slides" had no virus ever, and these are supposed to be samples of the god damned viruses. That's the good thing about having a molecular biologist buddy that I grew up with. "Virus slides" and chilled psilocin from the lab fridge. The medical grade shit.
What do you have as proof of viruses? What THEY say? Come now, Eisenhorny, I am not sure what you're puttin down, but nobody here is picking it up.
Again same bullshit back.
Cryo-EM is Cryogenic Electron Microscopy. Samples for Cryo-EM prepared on metal grids covered with non-metal conductive material. Usially it is copper grids covered with graphite. Some manufacturers have gold grids covered with graphene oxide for those who want to look cool, rich and successfull among colleaugues. It is like CasioF91W watch and Rolex. Both are perfectly precise but if you think you care about your image you buy Rolex to impress others.
Elecron microscopy samples could not be used in production. Samples are unuseable after making micrographs in electron microscope. So it does not matter what is the coating of EM grids - graphite, graphene oxide or Svarowsky diamond dust. It can't be in product after EM of production samples.
I already wrote about exactly same quotes from same paper - https://conspiracies.win/p/16ami9FpWH/x/c/4TsZfsxyc7M
Seems nobody cares. And nobody bother to question anyything.
Bingo. It confirms a bias therefore it must be true.
That's a damn fucking lie, nothing else. This dumb bullshit claim has been posted before.
Should I explain to you why it's bullshit? You could know it yourself if you had actually read the article.
Why the fuck are you so pro-vaccine, champ? You have a shit- ton of research yet to do if you don't know about the dubious nature of viruses (at least as they are portrayed vs. what they actually are) and I can tell you FROM EXPERIENCE having spent about a solid week going through MIT slides that all of the "virus slides" had no virus ever, and these are supposed to be samples of the god damned viruses. That's the good thing about having a molecular biologist buddy that I grew up with. "Virus slides" and chilled psilocin from the lab fridge. The medical grade shit.
What do you have as proof of viruses? What THEY say? Come now, Eisenhorny, I am not sure what you're puttin down, but nobody here is picking it up.
https://youtu.be/x8ihJXP6XIo
This has nothing at all to do with my comment so what's your point?
Do you believe that this article shows that the "FDA Confirms Graphene Oxide Is in the mRNA Covid-19 Vaccines"?