Analemma's disprove your claim. You can capture an annalema by taking a picture of the sun at one location, every 24 hours, for a whole year. The sun will produce a figure 8 pattern. This will cause the shadow on a sun dial to vary a miniscule amount through the seasons. This is not enough to throw off a sun dial for practical purposes. Ideally you would align the dial to somewhere in the middle of the annalemma.
In the globe demonstration above it looks like spring and fall would have the shadow cast at about a 45+ degree angle difference. Sun dials don't have to be adjusted once you set them up. Some ancient sundials haven't moved in thousands of years.
Do you understant that this 8 is not vertical, but tilted in the sky when you are not on equator? Timelapse pictures in your pedowikia article show that clearly. At point where stick is glued on your meme picture it will be tilted at approx 45°. So with ~23° of Earth rotational axis inclination you will get 8 with the height of ~46° tilted by 45°. So maximum sweep angle for solar noon to clock noon will be 46° / sqrt(2) = ~33°.
If you take parallel light source instead of lamp, and set globe axis tilt to correct 23° (instead of 30° you have on picture) you will get exactly this 33° instead of your "about a 45°" (really ~43° on your picture, which is close to what you will really have on some planet with 30° axis inclination).
I have a public sundial that I look at down the street. All year long the thing is accurate to within 15 minutes or less. No one ever adjusts it because it's set in concrete. I would have to measure how many degrees off it is at maximum, but I would guess 1 or 2 degrees (angle of the shadow). I want to test out that globe simulation so I could get a rough estimate of how far off the shadow is between spring and fall, but if those pics are at all accurate, 45+ degrees off would equate to HOURS of error. It's not even close.
OMG. Did you have geometry classes in your school?
You will have ±15 min precision during a year if you put a stick parallel to Earth axis, and not like on your picture. You could take a globe, glue stick parallel to rotation axis and suddenly find out that now stick shadow do not change its angle when you simulate orbiting the sun.
If you repeat on the Earth what is shown in your meme, you will get ±1 hour precision from vertical stick at same latitude. On the planet with 30° inclination as in the meme, instead of Earth's 23°, you will get ±1.5 hour precision, if that planet will have same rotation speed as Earth.
Well, this is yet another funny example when FE apologist did not even bother to find out how things works before making some statements about that thing. This is even more hillarious than that thread when they thought that gyroscope in mechanical aviahorizons is a source of plane orientation data, when in reality gyroscope in aviahorizons is used as a ~10 minute dumper for a plummet. :)
Is it a kind of infectious disease among your kind? Why you don't want to learn how things work? Or your goal is just shit on every forum where something out-of-narrative discussed? Do you know what people did with well poisoners at the time?
But you are right, sundials do not NEED to be adjusted seasonally… unless you want to accurately tell time with it seasonally. However they will remain accurate on a year to year basis without adjustment (like the ancient sundials you speak of).
“You can capture an annalema by taking a picture of the sun at one location, every 24 hours, for a whole year.”
If you do the same thing with the shadow of a post, or sundial, the same figure 8 shape will appear. The “fat” part of the figure 8 is not “minuscule” when it comes to telling time.
The noon shadow on a sundial varies and has a range of over 30 minutes throughout the year. Sundials are only accurate April 15, June 15, September 1 and December 24 (the exact middle of the analemma, and what most sundials are zeroed to).
You said sundials wont work on a globe because they would point in different directions seasonally. THEY DO, 100% fact.
Your meme also shows an exaggerated difference in “noon” shadows by not having the point centered on the globe. In the left picture, the point is set to the right of center. In the right picture, the point is set to the left of center. This will result in a more drastic angle. It is essentially comparing the 11 am-ish shadow to the 1 pm-ish shadow.
The light does appear to be centered. You can tell because the marker is oriented directly towards the camera on both pics. The reason the highlight is off the line you drew is because the camera (observer) is higher than the light (sun). The highlight would only be spot on if the light and the camera were in the exact same angle. The geometry isn't hard to comprehend. You really think you can correct that big of an angle difference with the shadow?
I told someone this in another post:
I have a public sundial that I look at down the street. All year long the thing is accurate to within 15 minutes or less. No one ever adjusts it because it's set in concrete. I would have to measure how many degrees off it is at maximum, but I would guess 1 or 2 degrees (angle of the shadow). I want to test out that globe simulation so I could get a rough estimate of how far off the shadow is between spring and fall, but if those pics are at all accurate, 45+ degrees off would equate to HOURS of error. It's not even close.
The light is on the OTHER side of the centerline. This will result in even MORE of an angle.
“accurate to within 15 minutes or less.”
15 minutes on either side is a 30 minute range, like I said. You need to “adjust” for that seasonally. The sundial does not have to be physically moved, the time needs adjustment. Can’t believe I need to spell that out.
“guess 1 or 2 degrees”
We do not need to guess, 30 minutes on a sundial is 20 degrees. Get a protractor and sundial and measure yourself. It is very funny you guessed 1-2, way WAY off.
To sum up, your 45 degree estimate is way too big. And your estimate of 1-2 degrees is way too small.
The highlight on the globe is due to the position of the observer. If the observer lowered to the same position as the light, the highlight would be centered. Draw a picture of the camera, globe, and flashlight (with the camera being over the flashlight).
Have you ever used a sundial? The position is not changed once you set it up. If you live in an area with daylight savings time, you have to account for that or else the sundial will appear an hour off. If you live in an area with no time changes through the year, your sundial will be accurate to within 15 minutes all year long.
Let's do some math. There are 360° in a circle or clock face. There are 24 hours per day. This is 15° to represent one hour. If the shadow cast is 15 min early, or 15 min late at max, this would be 3.75° of error. Like I said that is a very small angle. It would not be a 7.5° (30 min) error because you are measuring the angle between true time and the shadow cast, which does not exceed 15 min.
Analemma's disprove your claim. You can capture an annalema by taking a picture of the sun at one location, every 24 hours, for a whole year. The sun will produce a figure 8 pattern. This will cause the shadow on a sun dial to vary a miniscule amount through the seasons. This is not enough to throw off a sun dial for practical purposes. Ideally you would align the dial to somewhere in the middle of the annalemma.
In the globe demonstration above it looks like spring and fall would have the shadow cast at about a 45+ degree angle difference. Sun dials don't have to be adjusted once you set them up. Some ancient sundials haven't moved in thousands of years.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analemma
Do you understant that this 8 is not vertical, but tilted in the sky when you are not on equator? Timelapse pictures in your pedowikia article show that clearly. At point where stick is glued on your meme picture it will be tilted at approx 45°. So with ~23° of Earth rotational axis inclination you will get 8 with the height of ~46° tilted by 45°. So maximum sweep angle for solar noon to clock noon will be 46° / sqrt(2) = ~33°.
If you take parallel light source instead of lamp, and set globe axis tilt to correct 23° (instead of 30° you have on picture) you will get exactly this 33° instead of your "about a 45°" (really ~43° on your picture, which is close to what you will really have on some planet with 30° axis inclination).
I have a public sundial that I look at down the street. All year long the thing is accurate to within 15 minutes or less. No one ever adjusts it because it's set in concrete. I would have to measure how many degrees off it is at maximum, but I would guess 1 or 2 degrees (angle of the shadow). I want to test out that globe simulation so I could get a rough estimate of how far off the shadow is between spring and fall, but if those pics are at all accurate, 45+ degrees off would equate to HOURS of error. It's not even close.
OMG. Did you have geometry classes in your school?
You will have ±15 min precision during a year if you put a stick parallel to Earth axis, and not like on your picture. You could take a globe, glue stick parallel to rotation axis and suddenly find out that now stick shadow do not change its angle when you simulate orbiting the sun.
If you repeat on the Earth what is shown in your meme, you will get ±1 hour precision from vertical stick at same latitude. On the planet with 30° inclination as in the meme, instead of Earth's 23°, you will get ±1.5 hour precision, if that planet will have same rotation speed as Earth.
Well, this is yet another funny example when FE apologist did not even bother to find out how things works before making some statements about that thing. This is even more hillarious than that thread when they thought that gyroscope in mechanical aviahorizons is a source of plane orientation data, when in reality gyroscope in aviahorizons is used as a ~10 minute dumper for a plummet. :)
Is it a kind of infectious disease among your kind? Why you don't want to learn how things work? Or your goal is just shit on every forum where something out-of-narrative discussed? Do you know what people did with well poisoners at the time?
You sound vaccinated.
Flat Earther: Looks at an image, does not understand whats going on, and concludes that it's fake.
Every
Single
Time
In no way does analemma disprove my claim.
But you are right, sundials do not NEED to be adjusted seasonally… unless you want to accurately tell time with it seasonally. However they will remain accurate on a year to year basis without adjustment (like the ancient sundials you speak of).
“You can capture an annalema by taking a picture of the sun at one location, every 24 hours, for a whole year.”
If you do the same thing with the shadow of a post, or sundial, the same figure 8 shape will appear. The “fat” part of the figure 8 is not “minuscule” when it comes to telling time.
The noon shadow on a sundial varies and has a range of over 30 minutes throughout the year. Sundials are only accurate April 15, June 15, September 1 and December 24 (the exact middle of the analemma, and what most sundials are zeroed to).
You said sundials wont work on a globe because they would point in different directions seasonally. THEY DO, 100% fact.
Your meme also shows an exaggerated difference in “noon” shadows by not having the point centered on the globe. In the left picture, the point is set to the right of center. In the right picture, the point is set to the left of center. This will result in a more drastic angle. It is essentially comparing the 11 am-ish shadow to the 1 pm-ish shadow.
Here is a picture showing this:
https://gab.com/TheGreyGuy/posts/110703866648658230
I know how you people continuously move the goal post, so I am done. Have a good life.
The light does appear to be centered. You can tell because the marker is oriented directly towards the camera on both pics. The reason the highlight is off the line you drew is because the camera (observer) is higher than the light (sun). The highlight would only be spot on if the light and the camera were in the exact same angle. The geometry isn't hard to comprehend. You really think you can correct that big of an angle difference with the shadow?
I told someone this in another post: I have a public sundial that I look at down the street. All year long the thing is accurate to within 15 minutes or less. No one ever adjusts it because it's set in concrete. I would have to measure how many degrees off it is at maximum, but I would guess 1 or 2 degrees (angle of the shadow). I want to test out that globe simulation so I could get a rough estimate of how far off the shadow is between spring and fall, but if those pics are at all accurate, 45+ degrees off would equate to HOURS of error. It's not even close.
The light is on the OTHER side of the centerline. This will result in even MORE of an angle.
“accurate to within 15 minutes or less.”
15 minutes on either side is a 30 minute range, like I said. You need to “adjust” for that seasonally. The sundial does not have to be physically moved, the time needs adjustment. Can’t believe I need to spell that out.
“guess 1 or 2 degrees”
We do not need to guess, 30 minutes on a sundial is 20 degrees. Get a protractor and sundial and measure yourself. It is very funny you guessed 1-2, way WAY off.
To sum up, your 45 degree estimate is way too big. And your estimate of 1-2 degrees is way too small.
The highlight on the globe is due to the position of the observer. If the observer lowered to the same position as the light, the highlight would be centered. Draw a picture of the camera, globe, and flashlight (with the camera being over the flashlight).
Have you ever used a sundial? The position is not changed once you set it up. If you live in an area with daylight savings time, you have to account for that or else the sundial will appear an hour off. If you live in an area with no time changes through the year, your sundial will be accurate to within 15 minutes all year long.
Let's do some math. There are 360° in a circle or clock face. There are 24 hours per day. This is 15° to represent one hour. If the shadow cast is 15 min early, or 15 min late at max, this would be 3.75° of error. Like I said that is a very small angle. It would not be a 7.5° (30 min) error because you are measuring the angle between true time and the shadow cast, which does not exceed 15 min.