The biggest psyops is the neutrino being a particle all the freaking time. It's not.
Get the graph of beta decay, remove the title, go ask physics students of masters or phd program. They will say this doesn't look a particle here, this event has a continuous curve.
The issue is, if there is an anti-neutrino with spin conservation getting out of neutron (then traveled through everything because it doesn't interact with anything), then it should not be a continuous curve. It should be a one-off event. The curve would have been lot steeper.
So this means neutrinos are just perceived angular momentum. spin conservation is not real, at least not an addition, it's calculus.
Neutrino- why the hell it doesn't interact with anything, we don't know.
how do they get mass? we don't know. Because mass is when left handed particle interacts with right handed particle. and right handed neutrino doesn't exist. Whole fudging thing doesn't make sense.
What makes sense is the zero-point energy being generated. Thanks Neutron/proton-electron.
Meanwhile Eddie Bravo and Alex Jones are saying there are no such thing as nuclear bomb. They are flat earthers so they may be doing psyops for federal reserve
Spinors are the twisting of waves of nothing, Spinors are the particles and mass (spin) that make up our universe.
Nukes are real, but not very effective. They produce an incredible amount of heat and radiation, they don't produce much pressure. They are analogous to bolts of lightening or turning on a light.
Even worse is the Pressure from the explosion is the inverse of the cubed root, 1/r^3. Which means a nuke needs to explode underwater to do much of anything.
Precision guided missiles are the weapons of choice, especially Russia's hypersonic missiles.
Some question whether neutrinos even exist at all. David de Hilster points out that the "need" from neutrinos arose from particle collision experiments not showing the required energy output calculated using Einstein's relativity. But that assumes we need to conform results to Einstein's theory rather than the other way around. It may be a faulty assumption.
The biggest psyops is the neutrino being a particle all the freaking time. It's not.
Get the graph of beta decay, remove the title, go ask physics students of masters or phd program. They will say this doesn't look a particle here, this event has a continuous curve.
The issue is, if there is an anti-neutrino with spin conservation getting out of neutron (then traveled through everything because it doesn't interact with anything), then it should not be a continuous curve. It should be a one-off event. The curve would have been lot steeper.
So this means neutrinos are just perceived angular momentum. spin conservation is not real, at least not an addition, it's calculus.
Neutrino- why the hell it doesn't interact with anything, we don't know.
how do they get mass? we don't know. Because mass is when left handed particle interacts with right handed particle. and right handed neutrino doesn't exist. Whole fudging thing doesn't make sense.
What makes sense is the zero-point energy being generated. Thanks Neutron/proton-electron.
Meanwhile Eddie Bravo and Alex Jones are saying there are no such thing as nuclear bomb. They are flat earthers so they may be doing psyops for federal reserve
Everything is waves of nothing.
Spinors are the twisting of waves of nothing, Spinors are the particles and mass (spin) that make up our universe.
Nukes are real, but not very effective. They produce an incredible amount of heat and radiation, they don't produce much pressure. They are analogous to bolts of lightening or turning on a light.
Even worse is the Pressure from the explosion is the inverse of the cubed root, 1/r^3. Which means a nuke needs to explode underwater to do much of anything.
Precision guided missiles are the weapons of choice, especially Russia's hypersonic missiles.
When has Alex Jones said there are no nukes? He has talked about Nukes frequently, bases, generals, weapons.
Please link before you quote somebody else. No Alex Jones isn't a Flat Eartger either.
Link crap before you drop names.
The debate on Flat Earth didn't prove Alex Jones is a Flat Earther. Unlike yourself.
Some question whether neutrinos even exist at all. David de Hilster points out that the "need" from neutrinos arose from particle collision experiments not showing the required energy output calculated using Einstein's relativity. But that assumes we need to conform results to Einstein's theory rather than the other way around. It may be a faulty assumption.