You insult yourself. You made an conclusion without reviewing the material. I even gave you a quicker method of podcast interviews on YouTube. And, the book says nothing about Jesus being a homosexual. It says he was married, and had children. Tuck that ignorant rage baiting in.
Ralph Ellis is heavily cited by Michael Tsarion, and heavily cites both original manuscripts, and Lawrence Gardner.
Yawn that's not material. I haven't insulted anyone.
I have questioned origin. I am not assuming I am correct, unlike yourself equally providing me with conspiracy. You have set a paradox into stone. A paradox I have tried to establish is fraught with controversy. Any origin is gibberish there is only controversy. So questionably it is where any counter arguments come from like your claim. But they are ultimately baseless because any origin is debatable.
I am challenging you to be open minded. Specifically about that origin. Lastly I utterly refute Cleopatra was Jesus's mother. It would make him a mortal, birthed by whom? Roman origin, Caesar, Mark Anthony, Octavian, a gigglo, an ass? Come on. Angering far more than any Jews. Of which he wouldn't have been crucified, because he was royalty. There were no pharaohs after her. None. It is utterly ridiculous.
So no I am not reading, although I am sure it's fascinating. But it proves nothing, outside of vague insertions.
The close minded don't get to challenge other to be open minded. You made a conclusion on material you haven't reviewed, and refused. Why are you wasting my time?!
You've proved you're hostile. Look down votes. Pretty closed minded. All because I didn't share your joy at yet another Cleopatra. Who ironically you're assuming is the mother of Christ. Hahaha. Instead of historically the Whore of Egypt.
Pause and think about it. You see Egypt was around for thousands of years, it weathered invasions, hostile Empires, civil wars, and tyrants. Until guess who ended its tradition and religion by being the last of its dynasties. Hence the obvious title.
But these millennial remakes haven't shown that shame. Because she has been romanticised by actors since Shakespeare as some other empowerment. Instead of factually portraying what she caused.
For all we know she was Jezebel? It is how inaccurate the Bible is. Instead of no, isn't the timeline also out? Conjecture you're providing.
You've proved you use the woke method of redefining words. Hostile would be vulgar, or aggressive language. You still have not mad yourself aware of the materials, so none of your replies mean anything.
You insult yourself. You made an conclusion without reviewing the material. I even gave you a quicker method of podcast interviews on YouTube. And, the book says nothing about Jesus being a homosexual. It says he was married, and had children. Tuck that ignorant rage baiting in.
Ralph Ellis is heavily cited by Michael Tsarion, and heavily cites both original manuscripts, and Lawrence Gardner.
Yawn that's not material. I haven't insulted anyone.
I have questioned origin. I am not assuming I am correct, unlike yourself equally providing me with conspiracy. You have set a paradox into stone. A paradox I have tried to establish is fraught with controversy. Any origin is gibberish there is only controversy. So questionably it is where any counter arguments come from like your claim. But they are ultimately baseless because any origin is debatable.
I am challenging you to be open minded. Specifically about that origin. Lastly I utterly refute Cleopatra was Jesus's mother. It would make him a mortal, birthed by whom? Roman origin, Caesar, Mark Anthony, Octavian, a gigglo, an ass? Come on. Angering far more than any Jews. Of which he wouldn't have been crucified, because he was royalty. There were no pharaohs after her. None. It is utterly ridiculous.
So no I am not reading, although I am sure it's fascinating. But it proves nothing, outside of vague insertions.
The close minded don't get to challenge other to be open minded. You made a conclusion on material you haven't reviewed, and refused. Why are you wasting my time?!
You've proved you're hostile. Look down votes. Pretty closed minded. All because I didn't share your joy at yet another Cleopatra. Who ironically you're assuming is the mother of Christ. Hahaha. Instead of historically the Whore of Egypt.
Pause and think about it. You see Egypt was around for thousands of years, it weathered invasions, hostile Empires, civil wars, and tyrants. Until guess who ended its tradition and religion by being the last of its dynasties. Hence the obvious title.
But these millennial remakes haven't shown that shame. Because she has been romanticised by actors since Shakespeare as some other empowerment. Instead of factually portraying what she caused.
For all we know she was Jezebel? It is how inaccurate the Bible is. Instead of no, isn't the timeline also out? Conjecture you're providing.
You've proved you use the woke method of redefining words. Hostile would be vulgar, or aggressive language. You still have not mad yourself aware of the materials, so none of your replies mean anything.