But, you do not have the right to abuse and threaten other users here. You also do not have the right to incite violence. Whether that be upon other users here or people at large. You can call people names all you want, even though you shouldn't (You should attack the argument, not the user/person), but you can.
However, telling someone to straight up kill themselves will not be tolerated as that was the original rule when I joined the mods ranks. Attack the argument, not the person. I'm not going to tolerate that shit and you will be temp banned. Other mods can chime in or PM me about it if they agree or disagree.
We are supposed to be a community here who help each other spread and seek truth. The only people I can see doing this type of negativity here are nefarious forces that are against those of us who wish for a better future. If you see comments like these, report them. I'm not talking about name calling... I'm talking about straight up calls to violence and abuse of other users here.
Based on my interactions with him, which would go quite far in length, I don't think he was a bot because he would, on rare occasions, use an apropos literary quote. He's a autist, I think, that can't quite grasp how others can possible think differently.
He's actually one of the most sophisticated minds I've met on win(This is a new account, I purged my old one). Anything he says he can back up with an army of sources, from state records to books from a few centuries ago.
I once saw him link a Spanish book from the 15th or 16th century that talked about a head Jewish rabbi telling the Spanish Jews to infiltrate Christian society by converting and taking over influential positions.
His ability to back up literally everything he says is remarkable. You'll rarely find someone else who does that here, and as far as I know, I've found no one who does it to the degree that he does. If only he wasn't so depressive and hostile to anyone he disagrees with.
Says the 6 day old handrub making up claims he’s black to somehow delegitimize his statements lmfao
Sophisticated? He makes a few insights now and again, but no, he's otherwise obtuse. His quote/response overuse of HTML coding style is impossible to engage with, at least on his terms. He expects you to reply to every question or quibble, and accuses you of being "nonresponsive" if you don't.
Not to mention he's utterly dishonest when "quoting" you, mischaracterizing what you say half the time.
His ability to be ignorant of things outside his wheelhouse, ignoring contrary facts when it doesn't suit his "argument" totally trumps his citing some obscure shit, when half the time he cites some post he made on conpro, as if that is a priori proof of something and not a tautology.
Dude shows all the classic signs of autism expressed in writing.