Now, if you just quote the abstract, I will know you did not READ or UNDERSTAND the findings of the papers. You need to read them, understand the inclusion criteria, heterogeneity of symptoms, and frequency/prevalence/continuation of health issues and then draw conclusion properly.
You will find out that:
most "long haulers" are self-identified
most have no signs of covid-infection (not even antibodies)
the symptoms are all over the place (no coherent symptomology)
most resolve all of their symptoms within c. 12 months of onset of whatever illness they went through
many if not most (data not conclusive yet) of those who don't recover have chronic underlying co-morbidities and factors that may play major causal part in their continuing symptomology (namely: metabolic diseases, obesity, high chronic inflammatory burden, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases)
I will not argue with you any further, until you've done at least as much reading as I have and have demonstrated the ability to read thoroughly, formulate hypothesis, reason from data and love the truth.
I'm not interested in Internet arguments, I've got a collection of Internet Wars oldtimer t-shirts already, thank you very much and have scars to show.
Quote one paper that supports you claims.
Just one.
I skimmed a few of the ones you linked and not a single one states what you claim.
Like you clearly show with your actions: You don't READ, you are not interested in truth, you just want to argue.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(21)00299-6/fulltext
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8366779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8214209/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33977626/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33791733/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95565-8
https://medwinpublishers.com/HIJ/treating-sars-cov-2-based-upon-the-fleming-inflammothrombotic-response-itr-cardiovascular-disease-theory.pdf
Now, if you just quote the abstract, I will know you did not READ or UNDERSTAND the findings of the papers. You need to read them, understand the inclusion criteria, heterogeneity of symptoms, and frequency/prevalence/continuation of health issues and then draw conclusion properly.
You will find out that:
I will not argue with you any further, until you've done at least as much reading as I have and have demonstrated the ability to read thoroughly, formulate hypothesis, reason from data and love the truth.
I'm not interested in Internet arguments, I've got a collection of Internet Wars oldtimer t-shirts already, thank you very much and have scars to show.