Ted Kaczynski Lore... was he a psyop?
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
TLDR: The important thing to take is that they were able to discredit Ted Kaczynzki's ideas which were indeed subversive to the system. (Worth noting these ideas were also spread by others before him such Ellul and Mumford)
With the result that If you go on talking about how technological progress has detrimental effects; you will be described as crazy.
Was in a liberal newsroom when he was caught and they all cheered. Luckily i got fired soon after.
I didnt cheer.
Psy op? wtf is NOT a psy op?
Well, blowing up corrupt assholes using their own delivery system sounds both incredibly awesome and FOR THE PEOPLE. The whole thing about his brother noticing a certain phraseology and turning him in sounds like bullshit though, for sure. Something's afoot with him and we'll 99.9% never know what it is. Who knows if ANY OF IT is true, like you said. Maybe the Unabomber was actually never caught and "Crazy Ted" was just framed.
Ya, I wouldn't cheer for that either.
The video I linked is long indeed but I thought I'd share what he had to say, Germ has interesting views on things and I didn't see him mentioned here before.
Anyone who had gone into Mathis' work might be interested to see someone discussing it. (Yes, Mathis is probably disinfo)
They flipped it by calling it a "one bomber's manifesto".
Industrial Society and Its Future by Ted Kaczynski
https://archive.org/download/kaczynski2/kaczynski2.pdf
The guy should have at least been an Art Bell regular guest.
RIP ted k.
IDEA (that which is seen)...ones consent to give CREDIT (creed; faith; belief; consent) to the suggestions by others, shapes those others into creditors, enabled to discredit the suggested information at will.
That which is seen implies perceivable...not the suggestions of others about it. Only oneself can discern the difference...not the suggestions of others about it.
a) if perceivable sound represents system; then perceiving ones within represent VERSE (short division of any composition), hence composition (inception towards death) generating division (life).
Consenting to the suggested POETRY (language of excited imagination) gives others ones power of consent to divide suggested compositions, hence dividing those who consent to reason against each other over the suggested.
b) suggested information represents SUB (substitute; put in place of another); which tempts one to ignore MAIN aka perceivable inspiration. Ones consent to suggestions by another...sub-merges together.
a) if one read about the story; then that implies ignoring perceivable (psycho) for suggested (logical); hence being operated (effect upon mind) upon.
b) "psy-op" aka psycho-operation aka PSYCHO (mind, mental; spirit; animating principle" + OPERATE (effect upon mind) implies perceivable inspiration.
The hidden trick...using the word "psy-op" represents LOGIC (logos; word; reason) aka suggested information, which tempts one to ignore perceivable (psy-) inspiration (op).
Suggested information as an effect upon mind implies ones consent to want to hold onto it; which tempts one to ignore that one needs to let go of perceivable inspiration. On the other hand...effect of inspiration upon mind implies growth of comprehension, hence growth of expression (perceiving) within comprehended (perceivable).
c) was vs wasn't implies reasoning (logic) about suggested information (logos), while ignoring that which perceptible is (pathos).
If you are referring to "Apollonian Germ" you can get to know his content through his Youtube channel which I linked here, he goes deep into how the "you know whos" have been planning things for a long time, He is more into European identity. I don't agree with a lot of his stuff but I think he really has some good insights.
In the odd chance you refer to Kaczynzki, then you can Google him and try to read his manifesto against technology.