Remember that when the khokhols cry.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
The probability is based on a number of factors placing the odds far higher Russia. They controlled it. Unless they have footage of another said attempt proving otherwise. You're defeating your own argument of natural causes. The rainfall wasn't higher.
How often does the upper dam controlled by Ukraine release the overflow? It isn't significant releasing it into the reservoir. If the dam was operational and maintained. Instead of bursting.
Probability placing it Russian objectively. The SouthWestern approach to the Crimea, on the eve's of the counter prooobing became flooded.
Ukrainian gain here is not social justice. It could be the upper dam. The upper dam now threatens the reactor. It also controls the flow from source, downstream. So if in the next 20 years as pumpstations, or more channels are made to the Crimea, it sooner depletes the reservoir, if let's suggest the battlefield hasn't changed. The reactor is also threatened by it.
Romans had everything to do with the founding of Russia. Dumbass. You're such a dumbass. Yes they also colonised Ukraine and drew crops from it. This is well documented. So did the Ottomans. Prior to the Romans, the Greeks had done the same.
This is very condensed history obviously but yes the Holy Roman Empire via the Church and appointed Monarchs expanded East pushing back the Mongols. Of course Russia set itself into the nation it became afterwards. Prior to this point Ukraine traded heavily with surrounding Empires influencing it. Of course history has conceptual narratives. There were horselords and tribes falling outside of the narrative. Any trade routes often date back much older than established narratives.
Probabilities calculated from numbers, not some "factors". You have no any numbers to calculate probabilities. Only thing you could calculate from garbage is garbage.
:) :) :) Who told you that insane shit? Romans could go fuck themselves, they are nothing in Russian history.
Did you mix up Russia with Britain? It was Britain where Romans had some role in creation of British state, not Russia. Russia is Empire by itself, it outlive Rome, Bizantium, Ottomans, British and some other Empires and never need none of them for anything.
Factors provide numbers based on probability, odds. Not dumb luck. It was no accident if it was expected. It was expected because it had been attacked, and suggested. It was an occurrence that was no surprise. Who gains and why?
No, the Holy Roman Empire moved capital where, tell me about this Russian? Dumbass.
You can't even provide plain data that could be used to calculate probability of non-existing Dnepropetrovsk reservoir excess level.
You could put your "factors" (really random and mostly wrong assumptions without any quantitative or qualitative values) into the trash.
unHoly Roman Empire fall to pieces leaving a piece of shit named Vatican. It does not move its capital anywhere. It just cease to exist, and Romans turn to Italians. Place of Roman Empire was taken by Byzantia with capital in Constantinopol. It become "Second Rome" that have nothing to do with Roman Empire at all. Different etnicity, different country, different religion and so on. Everything different. Russian capital Moscow become "Third Rome" after Byzantia fall, and as prophecy tell, there will be no "Forth Rome" at all.
That "Second Rome", "Third Rome" and impossible "Fourth Rome" is just a labels from prophecy with meaning "Empire capital", and not a sign that Romans have anything to do with them.
Jesus, what literature you read, if you read any? I want to know ISBN to order that crap for lulz. I already have official Ukrainian history schoolbook where Ukrainians declared being predecessors of Galls and builders of Egyptian pyramids. I think I need to enhance my collection of clown world nonsence literature.
You're like a retard child arguing crap.
Factors.
Russian controlled it. Had full access to it.
Russia built it. Knew it needed maintenance. Maintained it.
Russia attacked it. Destroying the road and railroad running over it.
Russia defensively has a better position by the immediate bridge and approach being inaccessible
Russia controlled the first settlements flooded
Ukraine attacked it
Ukraine controls the upper dam
There are probably more. I am doing this quickly
Who gains and why?
What are you spewing. It's inundated drivel. Complete baloney. Nonsense and ignorance. Rome was attacked by Islam, and it moved capital East. This isn't Constantinople. Much of Russia shaped when this occurred. Pushing back the Mongols. Although prior to it, Ukraine and all around the Black Sea was Roman. The Black Sea settlements are far far far older, Bulgaria etc. We are talking conspiracies here, not the concentric paradigm. So is Russia. Georgian wine making dates back 10,000 years. Seashells found in Siberia from Southern India date back almost as old.
As far as your bullshit is concerned stop it. Look up places in Western Russia from Moscow to St.Petersburg. Saint. You fucking melon.