Remember that when the khokhols cry.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
You're doing yearly averages, not seasonal averages. You haven't compared it too Russian averages either. Seasonal averages speculated that the wet and frozen ground delayed the counter prooobing.
Tell me this? Are there rains there now or falling next week? Look weather as in rain.
Instead you've given me some history about nothing else we're arguing. Kiev dates back to the Greeks? Or is it older? The other name I cannot pronounce. I'll just call it Bob. It was named after Bob the great. Hardly a soviet. But there you go.
It is monthly averages. Average precipitation for each month in a year.
Fuck. You don't even bother to look at a graph or understand what is on the graph.
No. Greek settlements was on the Black Sea beaches, since they are arrived by sea at the time of Greek expansion. Kiev was established buy Rus tribe Polane who came from north by land in 431AD and for some time was a capital of ancient Rus state millenia ago.
Meanwhile Bolsheviks set Kharkov as a capital of Ukrainian SSR after creation. Only in 1934 capital was moved to Kiev.
Dnepropetrovsk was renamed from original name Ekaterinoslav by Bolsheviks in the honor of revolutionaire Petrovskiy. in 1926. So you failed even here. Then, US installed Ukrainian government renamed town into "Dnipro" in 2016. Locals name it Dnepr for short since soviet times.
I didn't need to look. Why am I looking at if it rains in Ukraine. It fucking does. I asked is it raining there now, or is it due to rain there tomorrow. Not fucking bullshit. I also asked. Dumbass. The comparison to Russian rainfall. Further asking if it was a wet winter. Because you'd know it if you asked somebody. Books don't tell you that. You have to ask. Do you remember it raining more this year than it last year. Your fucking graph doesn't tell you shit. It averages it out.
No Kiev dates to before Romans, and older. 431 AD is before Rome. You dumbass. It is Greek. God damn it. Then the Romans.
I haven't failed in calling Bob, Bob. I didn't care about the history of Bob. I am not Bob. Bob's history is still being prooobed. Bob is likely much older. It was likely this other village and hamlet, before the name got changed.
Think about Bob. A bunch of people didn't turn up out of the blue along a historic waterway. They do in Siberia. We discussed the gulag already. But along Bob was a bunch of settlements. These obviously became cities as the demand for the waterway increased.
Said a person who recently told something about probabilities. :)
Romans have absolutely nothing to do with Russia. Rome is less than nothing in a Russian world. Complete zero. Anything Roman was and is just kicked out since forever. Pope is heretic and Satan slave. Euharistic intercourse with Catholic priests is a sin for Orthodox Cristians. Catholics are poor deceived souls.
Ancient Russians never needed any permission from anybody, especially some Rome (who the hell is that?) for building their towns or creating their kingdom.
You are so arrogant and ingnorant, but continue to spill nonsense exposing your arrogance and ignorance. Is it kind of masochism?
The probability is based on a number of factors placing the odds far higher Russia. They controlled it. Unless they have footage of another said attempt proving otherwise. You're defeating your own argument of natural causes. The rainfall wasn't higher.
How often does the upper dam controlled by Ukraine release the overflow? It isn't significant releasing it into the reservoir. If the dam was operational and maintained. Instead of bursting.
Probability placing it Russian objectively. The SouthWestern approach to the Crimea, on the eve's of the counter prooobing became flooded.
Ukrainian gain here is not social justice. It could be the upper dam. The upper dam now threatens the reactor. It also controls the flow from source, downstream. So if in the next 20 years as pumpstations, or more channels are made to the Crimea, it sooner depletes the reservoir, if let's suggest the battlefield hasn't changed. The reactor is also threatened by it.
Romans had everything to do with the founding of Russia. Dumbass. You're such a dumbass. Yes they also colonised Ukraine and drew crops from it. This is well documented. So did the Ottomans. Prior to the Romans, the Greeks had done the same.
This is very condensed history obviously but yes the Holy Roman Empire via the Church and appointed Monarchs expanded East pushing back the Mongols. Of course Russia set itself into the nation it became afterwards. Prior to this point Ukraine traded heavily with surrounding Empires influencing it. Of course history has conceptual narratives. There were horselords and tribes falling outside of the narrative. Any trade routes often date back much older than established narratives.