"...these two serious conditions have some important differences....An ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke...It occurs when an artery in the brain or an artery carrying blood to the brain becomes blocked....A hemorrhagic stroke isn’t related to blockage in an artery....The most common cause of a hemorrhagic stroke is the bursting of a small artery due to high blood pressure. It can also be caused by a cerebral aneurysm."
The vax, if it causes a stroke, could cause an aneurysm, but not the aneurysm by itself without the stroke first.
By dint of birth, perhaps, but I assure you that if asking for evidence after a claim is something you think is modernist, you've never read much ancient Greek philosophy or early Christian writings.
And I'm asking you to think. Not to assume the rightfulness of external information. Especially those you assume to be of a higher authority. Is nothing self evident to you?
Again, no offense, but your written words are not self-evidently objectively true while they may be subjectively to you, else you wouldn't be saying them (presuming it's not a deliberate lie).
Please take offense at this next statement; You are a modern man.
Please feel free to intellectually challenge yourself with this next link.
https://www.healthline.com/health/stroke-vs-aneurysm
Edited to add more after I responded, eh?
Did you even read your own link?
"...these two serious conditions have some important differences....An ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke...It occurs when an artery in the brain or an artery carrying blood to the brain becomes blocked....A hemorrhagic stroke isn’t related to blockage in an artery....The most common cause of a hemorrhagic stroke is the bursting of a small artery due to high blood pressure. It can also be caused by a cerebral aneurysm."
The vax, if it causes a stroke, could cause an aneurysm, but not the aneurysm by itself without the stroke first.
https://conspiracies.win/p/16a9zochb3/x/c/4Tq14Py2EvY
By dint of birth, perhaps, but I assure you that if asking for evidence after a claim is something you think is modernist, you've never read much ancient Greek philosophy or early Christian writings.
And I'm asking you to think. Not to assume the rightfulness of external information. Especially those you assume to be of a higher authority. Is nothing self evident to you?
Again, no offense, but your written words are not self-evidently objectively true while they may be subjectively to you, else you wouldn't be saying them (presuming it's not a deliberate lie).
I asked for you to think. The self evidence would be internal, not external. Which is what you continue seeking validation from.