Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

13
Whodunnit? That is the question. (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by no_public_id 2 years ago by no_public_id +13 / -0
53 comments share
53 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

But as far as dams went that wasn't a lock. It didn't allow boats through.

Well, then how you think ships move along Dnepr through all that dams?

Seriously, this is become boring now. There is nothing to talk about when you fall to your endless loop with beavers and ignorance without even little sign of attempt to find how things work really.

All in all, in any case Ukraine authorities completely controlled by the Western elites is the only ones who is fully responsible for that disaster. Either they damaged floodgates earlier and finally broke them rising the level using Dnepropetrovsk dam gates, either they torpedoed them directly when level rised enough to make disaster worse.

Well, at least West now have a topic for a whining about bad Russians and evil Putin, to distract audience attention from extermination of all that shitty NATO equipment and forces in completely failed Ukrainian "spring" counteroffensive.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

No, there is a reason here. My gut, and the probability is thinking Russian. Objectively there are more immediate reasons to expanding the waterway there.

Sure Ukraine are masochists. Yes they are very bad at it.

But outside of provocation nobody else in the globe cares about except Nato who are already arming them, it didn't do anything else except self inflict more torture. Unless you can state another objective? They're calling on international rescuers, blaming Russia for hampering attempts. But yawn. Most of the area in warfare was evacuated. We are talking about less people than a village need evacuation.

Yes there are accidents, except this was an occurrence. It was discussed, it was attempted, and it is no surprise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Ships don't there. Ships didn't pass that dam? Did they? Stop making this conversation boring. Ships don't pass through hydro dams. Since when?

We were talking about the ecological disaster to the beavers. They built a dam and it flooded over them. As they are in the Ukraine wild, and a native species, it was particularly hazardous to them. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_beaver

See look beavers in Ukraine in the green zone it's where it flooded.

What are you on about. It was shelled earlier, like the bridge was shelled. Except this time somebody said they put explosives in the hydro control room. No torpedoes. Dumbass.

For torpedoes to hit it is from the reservoir. Except there was no torpedoes there. Shelling or missiles perhaps or explosives in the hydro operating room.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy