OMFG! Is this CLOWN for real??
(m.youtube.com)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
I always thought that the Soviets must have really twisted history all around, but I don't think they ever took it this far. And even if they did, I seriously doubt the average person ever bought it.
Actually, given the 1.0/10 rating on IMDB, maybe average people are catching on in 2023.
This fkn clown claiming that Cleopatra was most likley half Greek/Half African. I'm not even a Historian and I can tell you that she was half Ptolmey(Syrian)/Half Greek. The Ptolmey's inbred for over 10 generations and even Jacob Abbot describes her father as 'More BEAST than MAN'.
Curious if this clown thinks both/either Julius Caesar and/or Mark Antony were half Greek/Half African?
I had to stop watching after he said landwhale Lizzo was the true queen of Egypt and twerked while she played the flute from her ass and ate sardines.
Havent seen this, but im sure its garbage.
The single truth is has is that afrians, including egyptians, were black.
I'm not convinced Egyptians were black. Most hieroglyphics do not give me that impression and the black egyptians depicted in hieroglyphics seem to be a labor class and always serving or kneeling before other lighter skin people in the hieroglyphics and artwork.
I wouldn't be mad if Egyptians were black. It doesn't make me mad. I'm just saying that the evidence doesn't support that hypothesis.
Robert Sepehr even shows many pharoahs with red hair and blue eyes. I don't see many black people with red hair and blue eyes.
Also, we have opened mummies tombs and they didn't have nappy black hair. So oops that doesn't support this hypothesis either.
It's possible that there could be a mass deception or hidden body of knowledge or that most Egyptian evidence to date has been hoaxed, but that would be a far greater conspiracy.
The study found that ancient Egyptians were most closely related to ancient populations in the Levant (modern day Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon), and were also closely related to Neolithic populations from the Anatolian Peninsula and Europe.
After reading Hewbrews to negroes, i saw it differently. Sure, its a lot of bible shit, but the bible can also be used as a historical account of the movements of peoples.
The evidence you site could be planted. Consider this, if its true that hebrews and egyptians were black, then it would destroy the white jewish narrative. So, with that much riding on this deception, that the jews are gods chosen people, wouldnt you expect a cover up?
The evidence provided in the book i mentioned is much stronger than the Robert Sepehr or supposed lack of nappy hair on a mummy.
Its worth the read. And like you, i dont care if they were black or not, i just follow the evidence. But im not gonna write an argumentive paper here in the comments, read or listen to the book of you want. Inquistive mind can only benefit
I believe that the Blacks of that region had a different appearance to blacks of subsaharan africa. Even Subsaharan Africa looked different prior to the more recent bantu colonization the image that we prescribe as black.
Maybe different, but definiatly not light brown like we are told egypians were. There skin was black, rich in melanin to survive the constant sun exposure.
Also, i forgot most of the details of which peoples moved where, but the Hebrews to Negroes book layed it all out, pointing many historical records, including the old testement, which isnt just fairlytails, but also has historical accuracy when it comes to peoples and mirgrations.
It changed my mind, i used to thinl tan colored drawings on pyramid walls meant that egypian were tan brown like we see today. But appearently, there are more drawings with blacker people, so, i domt think that hieroglyphics or a mummies non-nappy hair, is strong enough evidence to base an argument. But im only offering to "read a book" so, its not like this is a orgabized debate.
Suggesting "got it right" tempts others to reason (got it right vs got it wrong) against each other, while giving those suggesting the power to control both sides of the conflict, which they use to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will to keep the conflicts going.
Whatever others are suggesting represents an impotent temptation...only if one consents to suggested (want) over perceivable (need) does impotent temptation receives fuel by potent consent.
Consent closes circuit with suggested, which allows those suggesting to harvest everything invested by consent.
Someone do an unrealistic impression and casting job for this bearded faggot.
Also, this same faggot has probably complained about white people appropriating other cultures before. But when niggers and kikes appropriate culture, he's giddy and spews this pseudo-intellectual nonsense.