OMFG! Is this CLOWN for real??
(m.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
After reading Hewbrews to negroes, i saw it differently. Sure, its a lot of bible shit, but the bible can also be used as a historical account of the movements of peoples.
The evidence you site could be planted. Consider this, if its true that hebrews and egyptians were black, then it would destroy the white jewish narrative. So, with that much riding on this deception, that the jews are gods chosen people, wouldnt you expect a cover up?
The evidence provided in the book i mentioned is much stronger than the Robert Sepehr or supposed lack of nappy hair on a mummy.
Its worth the read. And like you, i dont care if they were black or not, i just follow the evidence. But im not gonna write an argumentive paper here in the comments, read or listen to the book of you want. Inquistive mind can only benefit
I believe that the Blacks of that region had a different appearance to blacks of subsaharan africa. Even Subsaharan Africa looked different prior to the more recent bantu colonization the image that we prescribe as black.
Maybe different, but definiatly not light brown like we are told egypians were. There skin was black, rich in melanin to survive the constant sun exposure.
Also, i forgot most of the details of which peoples moved where, but the Hebrews to Negroes book layed it all out, pointing many historical records, including the old testement, which isnt just fairlytails, but also has historical accuracy when it comes to peoples and mirgrations.
It changed my mind, i used to thinl tan colored drawings on pyramid walls meant that egypian were tan brown like we see today. But appearently, there are more drawings with blacker people, so, i domt think that hieroglyphics or a mummies non-nappy hair, is strong enough evidence to base an argument. But im only offering to "read a book" so, its not like this is a orgabized debate.