Is this from one of those NATO-installed nuclear recording stations that totally report legitimate information and definitely won’t be used in a false flag?
No. It is from old European radiology monitoring network installed years after Chernobyl disaster.
It definitely could be used in a false flag, so everything coming from that source should be taken with a grain of salt.
It is just an easily accessible radiation monitoring service, where I found something interesting, that is too small to be a reason for any false flag, because 0.15uSv/h is nothing, it is less than average background in a lot of places on the Earth not connected with anything nuclear at all, but that change from one safe level to another perfectly safe level is interesting. Also, those who interested could track changes to see if level will fall in next days or will stay at that level for a long time.
Is this from one of those NATO-installed nuclear recording stations that totally report legitimate information and definitely won’t be used in a false flag?
No. It is from old European radiology monitoring network installed years after Chernobyl disaster.
It definitely could be used in a false flag, so everything coming from that source should be taken with a grain of salt.
It is just an easily accessible radiation monitoring service, where I found something interesting, that is too small to be a reason for any false flag, because 0.15uSv/h is nothing, it is less than average background in a lot of places on the Earth not connected with anything nuclear at all, but that change from one safe level to another perfectly safe level is interesting. Also, those who interested could track changes to see if level will fall in next days or will stay at that level for a long time.