Hahaha. He's trying to figure out how to be gay. Edgy topic.
Logically with instincts they are honed from an environment, and experience, becoming preference.
Hormones can be increased but there's always choice, isn't there?
Unless tell me this. So we take domesticated animals, these are where the greatest bisexuality occurs in mammals, our species. Prevalent. Upon restricting choice, caging them, sometimes we give them a diet boosting hormones, etc, next thing tell me what happens. In the wild seasonally these animals are hormonal, they have fertility cycles. What happens again in more restricted wild environments, intervening, safari's, sometimes urbanisation. But it also happens in these animal hierarchical structures, acts of dominance, or rejection, causing.
Are humans much different? Obviously choice becomes preference.
So what causes it? No experience, no hormones, environmentally a child developing instincts. Until it becomes preference through choice.
a) logic/reason (Latin logos; word aka suggested words over perceivable sound) implies ones consent to the choices of others, hence ignoring ones own free will of choice.
b) way (momentum of motion aka balance) always offers choice; but choice can choose to ignore itself for others.
domesticated animals
Viewing other lifeforms as AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul.) implies being domesticated to ignore self as being animated, hence within motion.
bi-sex
a) BI (two) SEX (Latin seco; to divide) contradicts being the divided one (partial) within dividing oneness (whole).
b) others suggest bi-theism (aka dualism) to tempt consenting ones to ignore self.
c) instead of male and female (two) consider motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-forrm (sex aka distinction between male and female) aka all within one. Notice that the perpetuation of oneself requires intercourse with another one for off-spring. It ain't "2 become 1"; it's being one among other ones within oneness.
preference through choice
If choice ignores self for suggested choices by others; then others wield ones consent to shape preferences for ones ignored choice, hence the many representing followers of suggested orders, while shirking response-ability (free will of choice).
Consider this...was it the child's preference to speak or was the child domesticated to comply with the spoken word suggested?
If one chooses to resist speaking to others; will others ostracize ones preferences? Why is that? If each one wields free will of choice; then why can mass consensus be wielded by a few to shape the preferred behavior of the many into compliance?
Hahaha. He's trying to figure out how to be gay. Edgy topic.
Logically with instincts they are honed from an environment, and experience, becoming preference.
Hormones can be increased but there's always choice, isn't there?
Unless tell me this. So we take domesticated animals, these are where the greatest bisexuality occurs in mammals, our species. Prevalent. Upon restricting choice, caging them, sometimes we give them a diet boosting hormones, etc, next thing tell me what happens. In the wild seasonally these animals are hormonal, they have fertility cycles. What happens again in more restricted wild environments, intervening, safari's, sometimes urbanisation. But it also happens in these animal hierarchical structures, acts of dominance, or rejection, causing.
Are humans much different? Obviously choice becomes preference.
So what causes it? No experience, no hormones, environmentally a child developing instincts. Until it becomes preference through choice.
These stupid topics aren't clever.
Why are you acting gay? Why did you want to find out about gays? I am not a shill, the topic is shilling gays.
I added an opinion it actually contradicts some of their community claims. These are stating it is genetic.
I find it unproven and contrary.
You wanted conspiracies into pheromones or hormones in the water causing your lust for gays? Or the subliminal programming?
I refuted this. Or please tell us why you're gay? Dumbass
That's a conversation ender, you're struggling with the gay thoughts.
I cannot help you there at all. Maybe talk to gay person.
a) logic/reason (Latin logos; word aka suggested words over perceivable sound) implies ones consent to the choices of others, hence ignoring ones own free will of choice.
b) way (momentum of motion aka balance) always offers choice; but choice can choose to ignore itself for others.
Viewing other lifeforms as AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul.) implies being domesticated to ignore self as being animated, hence within motion.
a) BI (two) SEX (Latin seco; to divide) contradicts being the divided one (partial) within dividing oneness (whole).
b) others suggest bi-theism (aka dualism) to tempt consenting ones to ignore self.
c) instead of male and female (two) consider motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-forrm (sex aka distinction between male and female) aka all within one. Notice that the perpetuation of oneself requires intercourse with another one for off-spring. It ain't "2 become 1"; it's being one among other ones within oneness.
If choice ignores self for suggested choices by others; then others wield ones consent to shape preferences for ones ignored choice, hence the many representing followers of suggested orders, while shirking response-ability (free will of choice).
Consider this...was it the child's preference to speak or was the child domesticated to comply with the spoken word suggested?
If one chooses to resist speaking to others; will others ostracize ones preferences? Why is that? If each one wields free will of choice; then why can mass consensus be wielded by a few to shape the preferred behavior of the many into compliance?