Suggested immigration (from surrounding towards center) tempts center (perceiving within perceivable) towards surrounding (suggested). Try growing center instead and watch surrounding being forced to make room for it...
to lower the overall IQ (intelligence quotient)
a) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)...if one consents to "stand under" what others are suggesting, then further lowering ones position implies diminishing ones resistance (growth).
Try growing (life) within loss (inception towards death) instead of willingly standing under (understanding) others.
b) to be one (partial) implies within all (whole)...others suggest "overall" to distract one from comprehending this.
One cannot be "over all"...only within. Others tempt one to consent to be under a supreme being (deity), which rules over all, which when consented to, tempts one to ignore choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence putting the suggesting one above the consenting one, while also giving the power of consent to suggest in the name of (in nomine) any supreme being (deities).
will be
Discerning self to be free "will" of choice instead of reasoning against others what suggestions "will be"...what if it's worth the effort?
Suggested immigration (from surrounding towards center) tempts center (perceiving within perceivable) towards surrounding (suggested). Try growing center instead and watch surrounding being forced to make room for it...
a) INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)...if one consents to "stand under" what others are suggesting, then further lowering ones position implies diminishing ones resistance (growth).
Try growing (life) within loss (inception towards death) instead of willingly standing under (understanding) others.
b) to be one (partial) implies within all (whole)...others suggest "overall" to distract one from comprehending this.
One cannot be "over all"...only within. Others tempt one to consent to be under a supreme being (deity), which rules over all, which when consented to, tempts one to ignore choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, hence putting the suggesting one above the consenting one, while also giving the power of consent to suggest in the name of (in nomine) any supreme being (deities).
Discerning self to be free "will" of choice instead of reasoning against others what suggestions "will be"...what if it's worth the effort?