18 () posted 1 year ago by Zap_Powerz 1 year ago by Zap_Powerz +19 / -1 43 comments share 43 comments share save hide report block hide replies
I agree though in this case, I'm 100% convinced Eisenhorn is a shill based on his bad-faith argument styling, framed to induce reactions rather than responses, much less actual discourse.
So, they are paid for engagement, even if it proves to discredit their claims? A real corporate mentality there.