I hate this nation
(www.mirror.co.uk)
Comments (35)
sorted by:
do not talk to machines
a) MACHINE, noun [Latin machina.] - "an artificial work".
b) suggested information (artificial) tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (natural).
c) perceivable nature neither "talks" nor does it communicate "not"...others tempt one to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words, and perceivable everything for suggested nothing.
d) suggestion represents the inversion of perception.
Take all the "heavy lifting" out of teaching?
Dude, it's a cush job with tens of thousands of dollars in benefits and you only actually work 9 months a year. Fuck off.
They are in inflation getting underpaid. Since Tories. Teaching is never terribly easy. I don't envy teachers.
But I disagree with computer generated marking.
We are individuals. Unless it is simple math problems and yes no answers. No, it should be based on the individualism pertaining to the criteria.
How does a rubber stamp validate this? Only the teacher knows their students and classroom.
I disagree with AI's motives and the attitude sweeping our public services today.
While I agree with the rest of your points, I still say teachers are vastly overpaid for the service actually provided. As I mentioned before, they get massive amounts of benefits (tens of thousands) and only work 9 months a year. So, they can tell people they make minimum wage until you remember the health insurance, tenure, pension and more that are provided by the school for free.
I just realized that maybe my (US) argument doesn't translate to the UK. I apologize if so.
Sometimes yes. But what is paid today. Some are certainly paid far more and have better options than in other roles.
However. There are many who aren't. Half of one, a dozen of the other. Like everybody else in inflation are also striking. Perhaps not as justified no, as nurses etc. But neither are billionaires capitalising off it. These have profited immensely in this current crisis.
Yes, that's a fair point. If it's anything like here, it's mostly the city teachers who are making money while the more rural ones get shafted.
a) what service? Where do teachers fit into "replacement migration" and "unsustainable birthrates"? What do teachers provide a child in this environment? What are students being educated for if self sustenance is already out of the curriculum?
b) SERV'ICE, noun [From Latin servitium.] - "labor of body and mind, performed at the command of a superior". What if consenting to superiority of others implies implies inferiority of self...wouldn't that be a prime breeding ground for "unsustainable birthrates and replacement migration"?
That's entirely my point. The "service" provided is insufficient at best, actively genocidal at worst.
a) what could others provide (suggested) that nature (perceivable) not already offers? Ignoring this shapes ones self sustenance into insufficiency...others tempt ones ignorance of perceivable into servitude to their suggestions.
b) reasoning (best vs worse) over suggested service represents the self inflicted; mental prison for those who ignore perceivable offer for suggestions provided by others.
c) growing oneself...as the center...grows ones surrounding, hence no servitude to others required. Others benefit from the fruits of ones labors; while laboring for others spoils ones fruits.
If we're still referring to schooling, I'd say that most children would learn best in small community settings, rather than a large "melting pot". Thus, a natural learning environment would be closer to home.
A tangent: I believe that a smaller environment enhances difference. In a massive pool, there's always a bigger fish. There's always someone a million times better than you at virtually anything and that can easily cause feelings of uselessness/inadequacy/hopelessness. In a smaller/tribal environment, you can truly be the best at something. You can be "special", for lack of a more adequate term.
That's not to say that there's nothing to be gained from outside influence, but a moderately sized environment allows one to truly flourish, whereas a larger one can easily smother.
a) the foundation for scaling down represents being "one"...you can't scale down further than one. Others suggest numbers to distract one from one-self.
b) the issue isn't about size of school or students; but the foundation of education through others...mass conformity to be educated by a few. This represents why one is tricked to view a few as the solution to the problematic many.
c) the suggested school system allows the few to vet those who stand out from the many, hence both non-conformists or exceptional conformists. The former gets isolated; while the latter gets elevated over the rest of the many, while helping to melt them.
d) a child needs to discern that learning for self represents teaching self and vice versa. Nature supplies the foundation for each ones growth of self discernment as perceivable inspiration, hence giving each one the free will of choice to adapt to perceivable (need) or ignore it for each others suggestions (want).
e) a child represents an OFF-spring, while the student/teacher dynamics tempts the child to stand under (understand) suggested information, hence binding oneself to those suggesting it. How could the child spring off if the child is bound to?
f) homeschooling tempts the parents to emulate school at home, which ignores that home exists before school. Sleight of hand: "home is where the heart is".
The surrounding (environ) of mind/memory (ment) represents perceivable inspiration aka moving differences aka the flow of input for the formed response within. The suggested curriculum (running course) by others tempts one to ignore the only running course for life...from inception towards death; hence within motion, and being moved from inception towards death implies the need for life to resist origin by adaptation to moving differences aka perceivable inspiration.
All of this can be discerned if one chooses to resist the temptation of suggested information by others. Self discernment cannot be gained through others, only by oneself.
a) to believe represents ones consent to the suggestions of others, hence establishing a consenting many under a suggesting few, which in return tricks one to seek a smaller surrounding (environ) for ones mind (ment).
b) to be implies partial difference (perceiving) within whole sameness (perceivable)...others suggest the inversion aka equality (same) through diversity (difference).
c) ones choice to adapt to perceivable, while resisting suggested, enhances oneself. Ignoring the need to grow self by wanting to grow through others, curtails ones enhancement.
Both "bigger fish to fry" and "bigger equals better" represents suggested rhetoric to tempt one to reason (bigger vs smaller or better vs worse) over suggested; while ignoring perceivable.
Is there such a conflict of reason between a butterfly and a whale? What if one can choose to draw infinite inspiration through each, no matter the size or judgement made upon?
The mental state of reason/logic represents the distortion of ones perspective through the lens of conflict...others exploit this by suggesting competition over suggested outcomes.
a) what's more SPECIAL, noun "a particular" than ONE-self aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
b) TRIBE, noun [Latin tribus.] - "descending from the same progenitor and kept distinct" refers to living (distinct) within the process of dying (same)...that represents ones perceivable tribe aka a division of whole into partial...not the suggested tribe tempting one into togetherness (socialism) with others.
To be implies apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death); hence ones struggle to sustain self among others.
c) AD'EQUATE, adjective - "equal; proportionate"...see; there's the contradiction within your mind...you're trying to find an adequate (same) term for being different, which tempts you to ignore your proportion as ONE (unit) within all. Guess who suggested you the term "adequate"....
How could one gain anything from "nothing"? Consider if the few suggest nothing as the inversion of everything perceivable?
To be implies within (life) fluid (inception towards death)...seeking outside influence from others tempts one to ignore being center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).
MOD'ERATE, adjective [Latin moderatus, moderor, modus, a limit.]...what if ones mind/memory is limited to oneself?
a) consenting (individual-ist) towards suggested (individual-ism) tempts one to ignore self for others.
b) IN (being within) DIVID (divided as partial within whole)
c) the trick...suggested DUAL-ism; hidden within perceivable IN DIVID. Therefore...ones consent to the suggestion of another one represents DUAL (two) -ism.
d) to be (choice) implies within base (balance)...
We (plural) are individual (singular)? The added "s" implies suggested collectivism aka putting the singulars together under the suggested umbrella "we". A rhetorical deception...we contradicts individual ones IF individual ones consent to suggested we.
TRANSFORMATIVE
Everyday in the UK, it's always somebody else's job. Assholes just want to get paid for doing almost nothing else. You're the problem for being the customer, raising a concern. It is in every public sector. It's somebody else's job. Tories have been the worst on the planet for this toxic attitude taking over our institutions.
This topic here can anybody tell me what is wrong with its approach.
Free up teachers teaching what. AI is marking. No sooner is it teaching.
We had it in COVID. The grades went to hell. Suicide increased. Online teaching. Virtual classrooms.
AI marking grades reviewing coursework. AI is sooner teaching. What is an AI grade? The same grade for everyone, the same homework?
Why are teachers getting lazier? They've been marking their subjects and assignments all these years until a Tory came along. Let's get somebody else to do it.
dont worry.. it hates you too...
Multiple choice questions can easily be marked by AI why do you need intellectuals with funny last names ending in witz and stein to mark your work?
Multiple choice, math problems, yes and no.
Essay's, homework, course work. No. Teachers for much longer took the time. Why is AI suddenly? Don't like any of it, least of all the excuses used to implement it.
It's stereotypical Tory nonsense. Until every other public service does nothing. Never come across so many of these public services doing nothing else. It's not our job. It's the next person's. Every one of them making an excuse because you're the customer raising a concern or requiring their assistance. A nation of cannot, sweeping it under a rug. They all flob it off.
Even their next dumb proposal get pharmacies doing more. Literal madness. Why aren't the GPs. You still need GPs. Stop passing the buck. Until like everywhere else you get a worse service, and you run around back and forth, back and forth until you're also barking mad. Sick of it.
The automation. I just got robbed by Oyster as well. Such a dumb system it robbed me before my very eyes. I topped up, ample coverage, I asked what's there, topped up. Did a bus ride and tried to take a tube going all of a stop. It robbed me. Had to top up again to catch the tube. What, I had more than enough for a travel card. A week later checked it, money back on there. I didn't raise complaint, stupid automated number, hours to get through, online form not telling me anything. Left it. What the fuck happened? It wouldn't have happened using my bank card, or that's theft. So what happened? The only thing Oyster has done is put up the price every year. All it has done. In the meantime it robs you. No more station staff. They cannot find out, or reimburse Oyster. They get paid to sit there. It's Oyster job. Some AI robbing us every year.
Every single one of them. Every public service sector. Back and forth like a clown.
School tests are multiple choice. Even college ones are. You don’t need DeShawna Williams some over paid African kween teacher to mark it lol.
Grading you idiot isn't an exam, also based on coursework. Coursework is a written paper.
Homework often has essays.
If you're doing art, design, cooking, music again grading the same as even sports all have written work.
Stop being an idiot.
At what point is grading strictly multiple choice yes no arithmetic.
I know you're autistic stop proving it.
No you fucking idiot. Exams are almost always multiple choice. Clearly you didn’t attend university where, even there, it’s multiple choice.
You're insane exams have multiple choice a percentage of the grade. The rest is written coursework. In almost every subject. It is often set essays on the topic taught. In higher education the exam is a smaller percentage of any grade. Clearly you didn't attend shit. Stop chatting crap to me.
What didn't you get through your retarded head we are talking about grading. It is also homework. It is often written work.
At what fucking point couldn't you read. I spend 90% of my time on here repeating myself to fucking niggers. I said multiple choice yes no and equations. Said it 10 fucking times. Sure. I don't like it. But I didn't disagree.
There are you are like a retarded monkey chatting utter feces. Because you cannot read. You're such a nigger you don't comprehend anything. You just sit there flicking dumb retarded shit.
Fuck off nigger.
What the fuck are you talking about you illiterate retard? Almost all exams in American universities are multiple choice.
The exam has a bunch of entrance material. I presume, not American. The exam in university is a very tiny margin of your grades or doctorate. 40%. The rest is your coursework? 60%? Subject depending. Yes the exam is often multiple choice questions and answers, except when it is a test on grammar, or various subjects, also requiring written work on the exam. But the fact dumbass is isn't the coursework. It isn't homework. It has nothing to do with teacher's grading. Wrong, teacher's grading and teaching influence how a student learns, and takes their exams. It is the exam board who grade exams.
This topic again isn't higher education.
Good. Then get rid of the teachers and the administrative staff and eliminate the department of education
You must be nuts. At what point have you considered this a good idea.
Humans get much dumber, their scores get worse. AI replaces more and more, as AI supercedes and is faster adopted into teaching. But you cannot have this. No motivation to learn.
There is no motivation when AI is faster writing the schoolwork and grading it. Literal Southpark.
It as you know is on a scale of real bullshit currently and getting much worse. Your worst nightmares. It can take a person and insert them into any background fully replicating their voice. It can completely write the script of any book, film, poetry, and even song. It can compose music. It can calculate rigging its grades and profits. It can hire and fire people. It is getting better and better at it, the more it is inserted. Until it is becoming unrecognisable.
At what point, do you want it replacing us?
Every fully automated system has become worse the more it replaces humans. Name them, there are a few handling bigger numbers, but the costs have increased far more. Our costs of living today. Our consumption. Our reliance on nonsense.
I am not fan of AI.
But I will take it as an excuse to shut down the government indoctrination schooling system.
Shut down the fucking government schools. Then you and I can piss on the Artificial Intelligence mainframe and fry the motherboard.
Nope it's offshore. It's the CCP. You know about that? That program.
Education is hardwired directly into the government supercomputer. It can start indoctrination as early as a child excels. It is already preselecting roles. It goes further on those experiments. It puts shit on the child's head, an electronic device that the child must keep on a green light while it's learning showing neural activity with problem solving and memory. If it goes amber or red despite the entry level child also fails. It also penalises the parents. The data, all the records, grades, head gear, is all wired directly into the big huge commie supercomputer.
But that point is it goes to big brother. They don't put that AI anywhere else.
It is doing what? Data collecting all the homework. Doing what else.
The entire education system is hooked into a government mainframe keeping a big huge eye on children. It has much worse intent on that agenda.
I don't trust any of it. Look at it today. Innovation has turned into bullshit. Meanwhile an AI gets inserted more and more and more. It hasn't solved anything apart from more and more dystopia as it embeds itself.
AI has been dominating headlines the last two months. I'm getting fatigue from it all.
I think that the AI presented to the mass public, such as this chatGPT stuff, is mostly dumb chatbot shit.
But I do believe there is an arms face for a quantum computer that can process terabytes of data in seconds and run monte carlo simulations and such.
We've had computers that can play chess but that's with limited parameters, only 64 squares on a board, only 32 pieces.
ChatGPT, has hit the fan. It's literally blowing everywhere on how advanced it got in all of a few years.
It currently is writing entire thesis at the level of grad student. It can write entire movie scripts. It can write poetry. It can write novels. In the next 5 years it will be inserting pictures into its words.
That's one program of AI. A gimmick compared to the other AI advancing. As I said previously it can take your image and insert it into any background replicating your voice animating your movements. That AI is being fully developed and likely already in use look at shit like the Ukraine.
Obviously the rest of any AI has been handling a bunch of other stuff. Like facial recognition systems fully tracking. Autonomous machines of every description. Growing crops. Trading on the stock market. Transportation. Production and distribution. Bionic implants. Cultures. Genome editing. Weather modification. Weapons. Exploration. Etc etc.
Homeschooling creates asocial retards. No thanks.
Typical old boomer trope.
Homeschooled children test higher on standardized tests and are far ahead, academically, than their public school counterparts.
Public schools turn out some of the most socially awkward mentally ill morons society has to offer. Homeschooled children are well mannered, grounded to earth, and haven't had to suffer alongside anyone they wish not to.
For example, a public school child had to wear a mask. A homeschooled child does not. Your false claim is that the unmasked homeschooled child is more socially retarded than the kid who wore a mask 8+ hours per day. LOL
Strawman, gaslighting and projection.
I'm sorry you were homeschooled. Your parents should be in prison.
Do you have children in the government schooling system today?
Home schooling is the way to go. There's dozens of great curriculum. A child can finish a full day's worth of school work in about 2-3 hours and then spend the rest of the day learning about nature, mechanics, agriculture, tech, etc.