I figure it's some sort of Holocaust denial because of OP's history. If i were to imagine, it would probably be something like
"the Jews said there was blue paint in the concentration camp but then when we look at it there's no paint. Therefore nobody has ever died."
But then the first ponder is: when was the idea of 'repainting' invented and was OP on-site at the time in question? Is he refuting purely anecdotal evidence with yet more purely anecdotal evidence?
I don't know what he's on about in this post, but I can imagine it's a waste of time just like all the other ones.
Well,.there was, but not for two legged creatures. That's as I understood it from the OG David Cole. It was for delousing. Didn't he come to that conclusion? I can't remember it's been decades so forgive me if I'm wrong.
I would give my.left nut to have Pfizer admit to the Hohocaust, even if I couldn't tell anyone. They were Bayer then, but same fuckers using "pharmaceuticals" to make money and kill people. With prejudice.
So much disinfo everyfuckingwhere I have no idea of the truth, I'm just pretty sure the Jews are the bad guys, but were they also called "Nazis" and the whole Israel/Hoho/Nazi thing is complete fabrication. We've seen them do it since the New Year, so they ain't above it.
were they also called "Nazis" and the whole Israel/Hoho/Nazi thing is complete fabrication
The few suggest brands (idolatry); the many consent and reason against each other over them (idolator)...perceivable nature doesn't brand anything.
pharmaceuticals to kill with prejudice
Hence notices of liability (detailed ingredient and side-effect lists) + contract law aka choice (suggested pharmaceuticals) to choice (consent to want; pay for; being prescribed, and taking suggested pharmaceuticals).
Without ones consent pharmakeia represents a temptation, yet through ones free will of choice it transforms into suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion.
The issue with snake-oil salesmen is that the many keep wanting to buy from them...
Most people don't know what you are talking about.
Just a nice reminder.
This is me.
I figure it's some sort of Holocaust denial because of OP's history. If i were to imagine, it would probably be something like
But then the first ponder is: when was the idea of 'repainting' invented and was OP on-site at the time in question? Is he refuting purely anecdotal evidence with yet more purely anecdotal evidence?
I don't know what he's on about in this post, but I can imagine it's a waste of time just like all the other ones.
About what I expected, so I search for 2 seconds and find blue walls in gas chambers:
https://www.majdanek.eu/en/pow/gas_chambers_at_majdanek/57
Well,.there was, but not for two legged creatures. That's as I understood it from the OG David Cole. It was for delousing. Didn't he come to that conclusion? I can't remember it's been decades so forgive me if I'm wrong.
I would give my.left nut to have Pfizer admit to the Hohocaust, even if I couldn't tell anyone. They were Bayer then, but same fuckers using "pharmaceuticals" to make money and kill people. With prejudice.
So much disinfo everyfuckingwhere I have no idea of the truth, I'm just pretty sure the Jews are the bad guys, but were they also called "Nazis" and the whole Israel/Hoho/Nazi thing is complete fabrication. We've seen them do it since the New Year, so they ain't above it.
The few suggest brands (idolatry); the many consent and reason against each other over them (idolator)...perceivable nature doesn't brand anything.
Hence notices of liability (detailed ingredient and side-effect lists) + contract law aka choice (suggested pharmaceuticals) to choice (consent to want; pay for; being prescribed, and taking suggested pharmaceuticals).
Without ones consent pharmakeia represents a temptation, yet through ones free will of choice it transforms into suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion.
The issue with snake-oil salesmen is that the many keep wanting to buy from them...
You are a liar and an asshole.