The Bible does say that all will be moved by him. King Charles is only capable of expending decades of capital built off someone else’s back. He has zero capability to move the masses toward agreement about anything, even his own country…. Let alone the world.
If the antichrist is a single person, I don't think he or she will be from an existing government or monarchy – and especially not one as hated as these "Windsor" pudwhackers. It has to be someone who can charm cross-culturally and internationally, and who looks nothing but trustworthy, intelligent and capable of running a planet.
This, unless of course the global cabal can't pull that off and just rely on mass genocide and brute force, in which case any ol' sadistic wanker can be a figurehead.
King Charles is nowhere popular enough to be the antichrist ^^.
I dont see the point in anointing the old fag if hes just gonna die in 5-10 years.
The Bible does say that all will be moved by him. King Charles is only capable of expending decades of capital built off someone else’s back. He has zero capability to move the masses toward agreement about anything, even his own country…. Let alone the world.
It’s more likely than whatever this comparison is.
But it’s all stupid.
If the antichrist is a single person, I don't think he or she will be from an existing government or monarchy – and especially not one as hated as these "Windsor" pudwhackers. It has to be someone who can charm cross-culturally and internationally, and who looks nothing but trustworthy, intelligent and capable of running a planet.
This, unless of course the global cabal can't pull that off and just rely on mass genocide and brute force, in which case any ol' sadistic wanker can be a figurehead.