Hang on. Why is a camera recording them? Not that I defend that guy. He looks like a bully. But that shit is private. Who knows what caused it?
Maybe he treats all his shit that way. Or what ever. It's another bullshit take down.
Because at what point is there that bullshit being recorded? At what point has it gone too, a third party? The press making it up. Where is that tape. How is it legal unless she complained?
Instead it's bullshit. Unless she complained. Who accessed that legally. Where is the actual footage, and under what law has it been released?
There are serious questions here. Not what that press says. The press is compromised today. We live in surveillance state. How was that shit accessed? Who cares what that shit is. Unless she complained it's hearsay propagating public opinion on what grounds?
This is serious for everybody installing those devices.
Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
Hang on. Why is a camera recording them? Not that I defend that guy. He looks like a bully. But that shit is private. Who knows what caused it?
Maybe he treats all his shit that way. Or what ever. It's another bullshit take down.
Because at what point is there that bullshit being recorded? At what point has it gone too, a third party? The press making it up. Where is that tape. How is it legal unless she complained?
Instead it's bullshit. Unless she complained. Who accessed that legally. Where is the actual footage, and under what law has it been released?
There are serious questions here. Not what that press says. The press is compromised today. We live in surveillance state. How was that shit accessed? Who cares what that shit is. Unless she complained it's hearsay propagating public opinion on what grounds?
This is serious for everybody installing those devices.
Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
On what planet is this legal?