Well, most people are morons. Just because they often use an incorrect word doesn't make anything correct.
Did you know retards use OK to say "all is correct"? Clearly, a good mental ability is not a common thing. And I appreciate the insult, it clearly shows who is willing to think and who is willing to insult instead... :D
There you go again. lol That's a glaring pattern in your comment history. Let me point it out for you since you're completely oblivious to it: When someone challenges your post or comment, you devolve into insults, trying to disparage the person's intellect rather than backing up what was just challenged. In turn, I'm treating you EXACTLY as you treat others. You're not the special snowflake that your daily affirmations try to convince you.
You really do a great job of highlighting your emotional immaturity and instability via projection though.
Oh, and I especially liked the part where your comment, like all others, still lacked any tangible evidence of whatever scenarios you've made up in your head. Being publicly delusional is a bad look. Go touch some grass. lmao
Nothing you say about me matters, kiddo. All that matters is for you to backup what you're claiming. And like a mentally ill man trying to become a woman, you can't. lol Sad. BIGLY. :D
You can get your own telescope and see. You can even build your own glass from scratch if you think the factory made one will have imbedded images or holograms or whatever.
There is so much wrong with these few words. Just acknowledge you're a pussy and have zero ability to debunk the flatards. If you went with the 'waste of time/distraction' route then you might have some respectable logic there. All this tells me is you fall for every controlled opposition you come across because they're getting attacked. As if it's hard to attack your own pawns lol.
How did he know when noon was 500 miles away? Carrier pigeon from an observer? Just saying. The concept of time as we know it was created for the trains.
Inversely, it would be our understanding of gravity and composition of known masses, that would be wrong. As for the depiction, I created it myself, without any concerns for accuracy of scale.
Because your reply doesn't address that, or the Question in the title. Nor the image, which is of a crater Earth model presenting a livable zone on a massive planet.
Oh.. Um. Ignore that other reply. What I meant to say was... i had a few different replies. i did address the question in the title.
No that's not it... Would you believe; I answered all of your Questions elsewhere! You're just not keeping up! Because of my big brain and stuff.
Personal note: That'll shut him up. leave him scrambling about this thread for hours, and then I'll come back and give a one or two word reply. Probably an insult about his mother.
wow. You watched that whole five hour video already?
I'm impressed.
Earth has zero curve. it cannot be in a crater on a large planet because we can see that there is no curve,
Well I can't argue against that. As your statements are not based on anything, therefore, I literally can not debate them. They don't even act to prove anything. You have simply stated them as fact when they are not.
OK. I'll take a stab at it none the less. The maximum visibility with landmarks such as mountains is 150 miles. Yet in reality, I have never viewed anything more than 50 miles out, 10 in my local area. Which in fact, proves nothing conclusively either way.
take a stance, prove something if you can, or just accept that FE is just a superior explanation for all that we observe.
I can't tell if you are contradicting what you have just said, or being metaphorical.
Either way, you are tripping balls my man. That and have taken far too many drama lessons.
I have no idea what it is you wished to have expressed upon me. None what so ever.
Your point of reference is magnetic north. On both a sphere, and an flat surface, or larger sphere, this leaves you circling your point of reference that you derive all your further calculations from.
You wouldn't be drawing from real surface area calculations, since you have no way of making said calculations. For this world. A world we have never received any actual photos of from space.
In addition, your link simply takes us to math lessons. Which in no way address the assertion in your reply. As it is simply math exercises, and not a rebuttal of any form.
Surface area worksheets comprise an enormous collection of exercises on different solid figures.
???
Was I not supposed to read any of it? Was I to simply be taken in by the colorful presentation of a child's lesson, and assume failing on my part?
Clearly you do not mean to appear as a forum gate keeper and bully suppressing free thought with basic insults and intimidation tactics.
You are here to help me?
You are using the words 'simp' and 'lol' ironically, and not as a true phone-tard twiddling your thumbs at your corporate owned personal device and tracker.
You have made far too may assumptions, on far too many levels. Scientifically, grammatically, your use of etiquette, and of the meta commentary employed.
I just expect more from people. when i see questions like yours, it means you have put zero effort into researching what FE model is. No one thinks earth is a flat planet, thats stupid.
Try addressing Questions from a more objective stance.
Inject or even start out with your own beliefs on topics so that other may understand your base assumptions.
Pick a tone.
State your objectives and objections openly.
As it stands, what you are doing here is muddy and aimless. Unfocused even.
Do try harder please. And stop languishing in your own disappointment. It's miserable. You bring misery.
The replies in this thread are from many unique users. Many of which do not make any sense. The replies only appear to contain meaning. Yet they are not grounded by any logic, or points of reference.
They are not "round" ... round is two dimensional or "flat".
They are "spherical" ... spherical is three dimensional or ... ... "not flat".
in common parlance, the term round is often used in place of spherical.
It is not. It's a term. You can't adjust it to whatever you thought it meant...
Let's pretend no one has ever called a ball "round" for the sake of going against the grain on the internet.
Serious question : are you retarded?
Well, most people are morons. Just because they often use an incorrect word doesn't make anything correct.
Did you know retards use OK to say "all is correct"? Clearly, a good mental ability is not a common thing. And I appreciate the insult, it clearly shows who is willing to think and who is willing to insult instead... :D
The hypocrisy of this comment put against your comment history is palpable. lmao
Your intelligence doesn't allow you to win an argument, your arrogance doesn't allow you to lose one.
There you go again. lol That's a glaring pattern in your comment history. Let me point it out for you since you're completely oblivious to it: When someone challenges your post or comment, you devolve into insults, trying to disparage the person's intellect rather than backing up what was just challenged. In turn, I'm treating you EXACTLY as you treat others. You're not the special snowflake that your daily affirmations try to convince you.
You really do a great job of highlighting your emotional immaturity and instability via projection though.
Oh, and I especially liked the part where your comment, like all others, still lacked any tangible evidence of whatever scenarios you've made up in your head. Being publicly delusional is a bad look. Go touch some grass. lmao
Nothing you say about me matters, kiddo. All that matters is for you to backup what you're claiming. And like a mentally ill man trying to become a woman, you can't. lol Sad. BIGLY. :D
When you forget which acc is logged into which tab.
You can get your own telescope and see. You can even build your own glass from scratch if you think the factory made one will have imbedded images or holograms or whatever.
duh.. we've know that.. the fucking greeks knew this fucking 1000 thousand years ago with simple shadow maths...
heres how they figured it out
no thanks... flat earth is a psyop to make legit conspiracy realist to look like whackos...
flat earth is the only "conspiracy theory" freely available on all normie platforms ... uncensored and pushed...
gtfo and go back to your catholic vatican 15th century heresy thinking...
There is so much wrong with these few words. Just acknowledge you're a pussy and have zero ability to debunk the flatards. If you went with the 'waste of time/distraction' route then you might have some respectable logic there. All this tells me is you fall for every controlled opposition you come across because they're getting attacked. As if it's hard to attack your own pawns lol.
you cant argue with stupidity...
How did he know when noon was 500 miles away? Carrier pigeon from an observer? Just saying. The concept of time as we know it was created for the trains.
This planet would be pretty hard on the bones.
Inversely, it would be our understanding of gravity and composition of known masses, that would be wrong. As for the depiction, I created it myself, without any concerns for accuracy of scale.
What he is doing, is attempting to disprove the theory through a common understanding of gravity.
Gravity is an effect. Newtons law has been tossed only einsteins remains.
When was the last time you were on another planet? Or even saw another planet?
Planets are just stars that move. They aren’t round or balls.
Now all you need to do is tell us what stars are.
I hope his answer is “Planets that don’t move.”
I too am waiting on this answer.
Since I've been eating sushi again ... I'm waiting with baited breath.
What do I do here? Go along with the pun, or link to the definition of "bated"?
I know. I'll fain autism, and do a little routine, breaking the fourth wall.
Gilmore? Is that you?
Ether. Dancing electrical ether. Look at some photos of them zoomed in.
Maybe you should have started by addressing my submission statement in this thread before replying to a Question you do not understand?
https://conspiracies.win/p/16b5lULSJF/x/c/4TsavcOyx4q
Because your reply doesn't address that, or the Question in the title. Nor the image, which is of a crater Earth model presenting a livable zone on a massive planet.
Oh.. Um. Ignore that other reply. What I meant to say was... i had a few different replies. i did address the question in the title.
No that's not it... Would you believe; I answered all of your Questions elsewhere! You're just not keeping up! Because of my big brain and stuff.
Personal note: That'll shut him up. leave him scrambling about this thread for hours, and then I'll come back and give a one or two word reply. Probably an insult about his mother.
Your mother sucks lemons.
wow. You watched that whole five hour video already?
I'm impressed.
Well I can't argue against that. As your statements are not based on anything, therefore, I literally can not debate them. They don't even act to prove anything. You have simply stated them as fact when they are not.
OK. I'll take a stab at it none the less. The maximum visibility with landmarks such as mountains is 150 miles. Yet in reality, I have never viewed anything more than 50 miles out, 10 in my local area. Which in fact, proves nothing conclusively either way.
I can't tell if you are contradicting what you have just said, or being metaphorical.
Either way, you are tripping balls my man. That and have taken far too many drama lessons.
I have no idea what it is you wished to have expressed upon me. None what so ever.
Your point of reference is magnetic north. On both a sphere, and an flat surface, or larger sphere, this leaves you circling your point of reference that you derive all your further calculations from.
You wouldn't be drawing from real surface area calculations, since you have no way of making said calculations. For this world. A world we have never received any actual photos of from space.
In addition, your link simply takes us to math lessons. Which in no way address the assertion in your reply. As it is simply math exercises, and not a rebuttal of any form.
???
Was I not supposed to read any of it? Was I to simply be taken in by the colorful presentation of a child's lesson, and assume failing on my part?
There is simply no need for this.
Theory: Crater Earth.
The Lost History Of The Flat Earth:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QetnEQ2pszMr/
Actual Submission statement?
https://conspiracies.win/p/16b5lULSJF/x/c/4Tsavh5f19V
What Questions am I allowed to ask without shame?
Can you direct me to the authority who decides this?
Is it you?....
Oh I see the problem. My submission statesmen was down voted, so you have no point of reference for what the Question actually means.
https://conspiracies.win/p/16b5lULSJF/x/c/4TsavcOyx4q
Clearly you do not mean to appear as a forum gate keeper and bully suppressing free thought with basic insults and intimidation tactics.
You are here to help me?
You are using the words 'simp' and 'lol' ironically, and not as a true phone-tard twiddling your thumbs at your corporate owned personal device and tracker.
You are a good man.
You have made far too may assumptions, on far too many levels. Scientifically, grammatically, your use of etiquette, and of the meta commentary employed.
Try addressing Questions from a more objective stance.
Inject or even start out with your own beliefs on topics so that other may understand your base assumptions.
Pick a tone.
State your objectives and objections openly.
As it stands, what you are doing here is muddy and aimless. Unfocused even.
Do try harder please. And stop languishing in your own disappointment. It's miserable. You bring misery.
I like your logic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TZW6lVLYP0 - American, right?
Glad to know this place is not totally lost on that one. People willing to research are hard to find, but so nice to know they are still there!
Crater earth is a fun fiction, but it just “passes the buck” on the real issues with the globe model.
Planets are wandering stars. They aren’t terra firma like we see on tv.
Submission statement:
The replies in this thread are from many unique users. Many of which do not make any sense. The replies only appear to contain meaning. Yet they are not grounded by any logic, or points of reference.
Actual submission statement?
https://conspiracies.win/p/16b5lULSJF/x/c/4TsavcOyx4q