For example, the whole idea of precedence is bullshit. LegalMan on The Quash podcast has explained it the best. Not only is the concept that precedence is etched in stone is complete bullshit, but the concept that the ruling on a federal supreme court case is to become new LAW OF THE LAND and apply to the other 340,000,000 citizens is itself bullshit.
The same white wife the black man has a prenup with? Prenups in 2023 don't account for your marriage becoming void because the husband overturned the ruling that made interracial marriages legal.
That man has to go. He's either being blackmailed, others or he's putting himself first, and damn anyone else. His ruling history is also bad. As in unsound judgments bad. CT will have his decisions revisited when he's impeached and 90% have already been torn apart in YouTube with legal lessons as to why.
I do not like Sotomayor outside of her rulings. But, I've taken the time to read a few of her rulings. I was very upset to realize the person I was reading about was the same person I was seeing with Pelosi doing dumb shit.
Also, my son has a habit of watching people that read entire bills, and explaining them. I'm not interested in all of them, but some of them he still has questions. Which means I have to view the material to understand his question.
You can get a brief opinion on every judge we currently have with this case
Critically, however, Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh were sympathetic to arguments made by the Postal Service that granting Groff's request might cause morale to plummet among the other employees. Kavanaugh noted that "morale" among employers is critical to the success of any business. And several justices nodded to the financial difficulties the USPS has faced over the years.
Don't forget the USPS just had walkouts due to LOWERING wages. Packages are slow like it was Christmas season, and now they took it to court that they can change a schedule whenever. They were already a shit place to work. Now they are on the, 'don't bother" lists, and this ruling was the icing on the cake.
I do not agree with the criticism against him.
You sound like you do?
For example, the whole idea of precedence is bullshit. LegalMan on The Quash podcast has explained it the best. Not only is the concept that precedence is etched in stone is complete bullshit, but the concept that the ruling on a federal supreme court case is to become new LAW OF THE LAND and apply to the other 340,000,000 citizens is itself bullshit.
CT wants to revisit everything specifically to overturn it. Did you forget about his wife? The one he made public disparaging statements about?
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/24/wife-of-supreme-court-justice-thomas-texted-trump-chief-about-overturning-2020-election-report.html
The same white wife the black man has a prenup with? Prenups in 2023 don't account for your marriage becoming void because the husband overturned the ruling that made interracial marriages legal.
That man has to go. He's either being blackmailed, others or he's putting himself first, and damn anyone else. His ruling history is also bad. As in unsound judgments bad. CT will have his decisions revisited when he's impeached and 90% have already been torn apart in YouTube with legal lessons as to why.
Seems like you are falling for the corporate jew propaganda.
He's the least threatening justice on the supreme court.
Most of them deserve immediate impalement, such as Kagan and Sotomayor and Breyer and Roberts.
I do not like Sotomayor outside of her rulings. But, I've taken the time to read a few of her rulings. I was very upset to realize the person I was reading about was the same person I was seeing with Pelosi doing dumb shit.
Also, my son has a habit of watching people that read entire bills, and explaining them. I'm not interested in all of them, but some of them he still has questions. Which means I have to view the material to understand his question.
You can get a brief opinion on every judge we currently have with this case
https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-tackles-religious-bias-claim-against-postal-service-2023-04-18/
https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/18/politics/groff-dejoy-supreme-court-religious-liberty/index.html
Don't forget the USPS just had walkouts due to LOWERING wages. Packages are slow like it was Christmas season, and now they took it to court that they can change a schedule whenever. They were already a shit place to work. Now they are on the, 'don't bother" lists, and this ruling was the icing on the cake.
https://www.dailydot.com/news/usps-rural-post-office-pay-cut/
It's interesting you like the ones that side more often with companies over people.
you are linking to the curated facts and twisted lies of reuters, cnn, and dailydot
Are you coming up with these ideas on your own, or just gradually allowing these propaganda outlets mold your perception?
Seems like OP is purposely spreading the jew propaganda.
Prove anything I sourced wrong. Show me where and why.