You may not like reuters. But, they gave every single judge air time. See for yourself. CNN expanded on, " the judges asked questions" by stating which questions. I did not like rhe way that played out. It's too pro corporate for my taste.
And, the dailydot is an article written about a tiktok my son showed me. I don't have tiktok. But, you can view it in the article. It's personal testimony on the tok with researched details elaborating in the article.
What precisely is there to take issue with?
I gave you an example, and on review I realized I had read more details. I found you those details. I gave you another example, and I found you those details. I'm gonna be honest... your reply was very disheartening Vlad. Disagree with my opinion. And tell me why, just like before. I'll learn something. Just like before. Don't complain about how I'm trying to show you examples of how I learned. I didn't shit talk your source. ( although if it's a smaller channel I would delete it).
I have a very antiwork pro union bias. And that case horrified me. But, that's the most recent case I read about. It's the easiest example. Specifically because you have already made opinions on judges. Why wouldn't you want an example from each and every one. ( On a case I disagree with no less!)
you are linking to the curated facts and twisted lies of reuters, cnn, and dailydot
Are you coming up with these ideas on your own, or just gradually allowing these propaganda outlets mold your perception?
You may not like reuters. But, they gave every single judge air time. See for yourself. CNN expanded on, " the judges asked questions" by stating which questions. I did not like rhe way that played out. It's too pro corporate for my taste.
And, the dailydot is an article written about a tiktok my son showed me. I don't have tiktok. But, you can view it in the article. It's personal testimony on the tok with researched details elaborating in the article.
What precisely is there to take issue with?
I gave you an example, and on review I realized I had read more details. I found you those details. I gave you another example, and I found you those details. I'm gonna be honest... your reply was very disheartening Vlad. Disagree with my opinion. And tell me why, just like before. I'll learn something. Just like before. Don't complain about how I'm trying to show you examples of how I learned. I didn't shit talk your source. ( although if it's a smaller channel I would delete it).
I have a very antiwork pro union bias. And that case horrified me. But, that's the most recent case I read about. It's the easiest example. Specifically because you have already made opinions on judges. Why wouldn't you want an example from each and every one. ( On a case I disagree with no less!)