Hmmmm....
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
Strangest answer ever.
Sarcasm is an answer. If your sensitive self cannot get it, that's on you.
Stop seeking a loophole where you are correct... You just prove that sarcasm > you.
Riddle me this ya goof: If Little Saint James Island doesn't have an airport, much less an airstrip/runway, what in the actual fuck are flight logs proving on their own? You're the kind of moron that thinks being photographed with someone notorious proves guilt in a crime too, aren't you? You're just projecting, calling everyone else's comments a waste of time. lmao
Actual evidence or STFU and GTFO. NOBODY cares what you THINK or ASSUME to be true, nor does anyone care about you trying to dodge having to say "I don't know" or "I can't prove it". "bUt mUh lOLiTa eXpReSs" lol prove it for any one single person on the flight logs that you're waving around like it's some smoking gun. Do you have any ACTUAL evidence or just your hunchy feelz?
I know the saying probably makes your bussy hurt but, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. That even applies to people you do not like. Sorry, kiddo. (lol not sorry)
Wow, I guess you had a lot bottled up already... Does this keyboard warrior sh*t works for you? Is venting online and insulting a new trend you picked up on tik tok?
I get it, you're a shill for Trump and you are here to clear his name by insulting anyone, who offers anything against him. Well, people in here are not as stupid as you are, so you would have a lot of work on insulting random people.
I guess you have some dirt on you that you keep safe by insulting others to oblivion. Doesn't work though... You call me "kiddo", yet you are not one acting like a child... :D Thanks for that, it makes my reply very easy. :D I don't even have to insult you. You are one step from becoming a psychopath... I don't want to be the one who pushed you over the edge... You seem quite unstable already...
So, no proof? lol
It’s not about getting it or not getting it. Sarcasm is the antithesis of being genuine.
You didn’t give a genuine answer, you gave a sarcastic answer.
Well, now you are dancing around a technicality on what YOU thought the meaning of genuine is. Whatever... If you didn't get the sarcasm the first time, you could've gotten it already since I said it was sarcasm... and "figure out" my response somehow using advanced mental ability... Or just figuring out what sarcasm is...
I get it though... You were in too much in the conversation and now you want to win the argument by standing on a technicality because you don't like my responses. It's not unusual. I guess you need more experience in that area to figure out that this type of conversation or "fake winning an argument" leads nowhere. You can count it as a +1 on conversations I could've saved if I wasn't so arrogant to get my way at all cost.
It's what the definition of sarcasm literally is.
But I digress, we can continue.
So every single person on the flight log has paid to rape children. Is their presence on this list the only available evidence, or is there something more concrete (like a money trail, or photo evidence, or some sort of witness testimony)?
Does this sufficient evidence exist for each and every person on the list, or is it only implied guilt through association?
Wait. You think you should wait for Trump to rape a child in a video before you believe it?
Yes, it is "guilt by association". How many pedophile mosad agents have offered you a flight on their PRIVATE plane? It's very simple logic - a mosad agent will definitely do a background check on the people who are in the plane to his secret destination. None of the people, who knew him, talked. If you had any idea what investigators do - that's clearly a red flag that should be investigated.
Btw, there is a witness testimony that implicates Trump, Clinton and more. I guess you should really review the flight logs as well and actually do some investigation. Or you would rather hold to your unbelief because you weren't provided a video of Trump raping a child, while confirming verbally he was on the plane with Epstein and fully aware of that. In case you miss that, that's also sarcasm.