Hmmmm....
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
It’s not about getting it or not getting it. Sarcasm is the antithesis of being genuine.
You didn’t give a genuine answer, you gave a sarcastic answer.
Well, now you are dancing around a technicality on what YOU thought the meaning of genuine is. Whatever... If you didn't get the sarcasm the first time, you could've gotten it already since I said it was sarcasm... and "figure out" my response somehow using advanced mental ability... Or just figuring out what sarcasm is...
I get it though... You were in too much in the conversation and now you want to win the argument by standing on a technicality because you don't like my responses. It's not unusual. I guess you need more experience in that area to figure out that this type of conversation or "fake winning an argument" leads nowhere. You can count it as a +1 on conversations I could've saved if I wasn't so arrogant to get my way at all cost.
It's what the definition of sarcasm literally is.
But I digress, we can continue.
So every single person on the flight log has paid to rape children. Is their presence on this list the only available evidence, or is there something more concrete (like a money trail, or photo evidence, or some sort of witness testimony)?
Does this sufficient evidence exist for each and every person on the list, or is it only implied guilt through association?
Wait. You think you should wait for Trump to rape a child in a video before you believe it?
Yes, it is "guilt by association". How many pedophile mosad agents have offered you a flight on their PRIVATE plane? It's very simple logic - a mosad agent will definitely do a background check on the people who are in the plane to his secret destination. None of the people, who knew him, talked. If you had any idea what investigators do - that's clearly a red flag that should be investigated.
Btw, there is a witness testimony that implicates Trump, Clinton and more. I guess you should really review the flight logs as well and actually do some investigation. Or you would rather hold to your unbelief because you weren't provided a video of Trump raping a child, while confirming verbally he was on the plane with Epstein and fully aware of that. In case you miss that, that's also sarcasm.
Not necessarily a video, but it would require more than a name on a flight log. And it's not just him, it's every other name. I would need there to be more proof than that.
Is it confirmed that every flight included acts of pedophilia and rape by the members on the plane, and not just Epstein?
I agree it should be investigated, but there's no reason they should be arrested until there is evidence they participated in these acts.
Great, that's a start! If there are also testimonies for all of the other people on the plane too then there's good reason for people to be mad none of them have been arrested. Otherwise, it's just names on a flight log.